2013
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.53.411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Precipitated Carbon by XPS and Its Prevention Mechanism of Sticking during Reduction of Fe2O3 Particles in the Fluidized Bed

Abstract: The Fe2O3 particles with the diameter between 74 and 150 μ m were pre-reduced with CO at 923 K to precipitate the carbon on the surface. Then the particles were reduced by CO at 1 173 K in the fluidized bed for examining the efficiency of the precipitated carbon for preventing the sticking. The result showed that the sticking of particles with high metallization ratio could be retarded or prevented by the precipitated carbon. For clarifying the prevention mechanism of the sticking, the carbon in different stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the direct contact between iron and iron is avoided, the diffusion of iron atoms is hindered, and the formation of solid bridges between particles is prevented. Therefore, the carbon precipitation reaction attaches a layer of graphite to the surface of particles, and the formation of the graphite is the main reason that sticking is avoided, which is consistent with the reported opinion [28], that is, carbon in Fe 3 C slows down the sticking of iron ore powder, but graphite inhibits sticking. Figure 8, a layer of metal forms on the particle surface and the dissolved carbon on the iron layer becomes saturated and forms a layer of Fe3C between the graphite and metal iron, thereby hindering the graphite solid solution.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Carbon Precipitation In Inhibiting Stickingsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the direct contact between iron and iron is avoided, the diffusion of iron atoms is hindered, and the formation of solid bridges between particles is prevented. Therefore, the carbon precipitation reaction attaches a layer of graphite to the surface of particles, and the formation of the graphite is the main reason that sticking is avoided, which is consistent with the reported opinion [28], that is, carbon in Fe 3 C slows down the sticking of iron ore powder, but graphite inhibits sticking. Figure 8, a layer of metal forms on the particle surface and the dissolved carbon on the iron layer becomes saturated and forms a layer of Fe3C between the graphite and metal iron, thereby hindering the graphite solid solution.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Carbon Precipitation In Inhibiting Stickingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Fe, Fe 3 C, and graphite were identified by XRD, shown in Figure 6. The main reactions are as follows [28]. The thermodynamics analysis of the above-mentioned reactions was performed using Factsage thermodynamics software (7.2, ThermFact LTD, Mont-Royal, QC, Canada), and the Gibbs free energy change is shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Reaction Mechanism Of Carbon Precipitation From Energetic Wamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[88][89][90] Due to the presence of the boudouard reaction (2CO = CO 2 + C), the CO in the reducing gas causes carbon deposition on the surface of the ore fines under certain conditions. The carbon produced is in two states, such as the graphitic carbon and the carbon in Fe 3 C. 91) It is generally considered that the carbon deposited on the surface of the ore fines has a physical separation effect and can suppress the sticking problem. However, it has also been considered that carburization will cause a decrease in the melting point of metallic iron, which leads to more serious sticking.…”
Section: Reducing Atmospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…131) However, in general, the amount of carbon coating that achieves the suppression of sticking problem is over 5% by weight, 111,132,133) and even more than 10% by weight. 91) Excessive carbon deposition is likely to cause an increase in the amount of dust in production, and is not conducive to the subsequent treatment of DRI products. Appropriately increasing the hydrogen content in the carbon pre-reduction gas can increase the metallization ratio of pre-reduction and reduce the carbon content, and make the deposited carbon unstable, 133) but can obtain a better final reduction to prevent the sticking problem.…”
Section: Carbon Deposition On the Surface Of Ore Finesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the large reduction rate, it can avoid the solid-solid contact during reduction thus solve the sticking problem existed in the fluidized bed or other direct reduction processes of iron ore concentrate. [2][3][4] Themelis and Gauvin 5) derived a rate equation for reduction of iron oxide particles by hydrogen with particle sizes ranging from 70 to 42 000 μm in diameter and indicated that the measured rates might contain mass transfer effects. F. Tsukihashi 6) investigated the kinetics and mechanism of reduction of molten iron oxide (wustite) with CO gas at high temperatures of 1 723 K and 1 873 K with a gas conveyed system, and he found that the oxide particles were melted and became spherical with reduced iron surrounded by liquid FeO during reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%