2007
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-7-57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the effect of sample quality on high density oligonucleotide microarray data using progressively degraded rat liver RNA

Abstract: Background: The interpretability of microarray data can be affected by sample quality. To systematically explore how RNA quality affects microarray assay performance, a set of rat liver RNA samples with a progressive change in RNA integrity was generated by thawing frozen tissue or by ex vivo incubation of fresh tissue over a time course.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
80
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, after 5 min in PBS there was a gene-dependent five-to 22-fold reduction in transcript level relative to fresh-frozen control ( Fig. 2 Thompson et al 2007). Surprisingly, 30-min PBS incubation did not result in a proportional reduction in transcripts relative to that found for 5-min PBS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, after 5 min in PBS there was a gene-dependent five-to 22-fold reduction in transcript level relative to fresh-frozen control ( Fig. 2 Thompson et al 2007). Surprisingly, 30-min PBS incubation did not result in a proportional reduction in transcripts relative to that found for 5-min PBS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomics approaches continue to be criticized because of inconsistent results (Miklos and Maleszka 2004;Draghici et al 2006), and while some of this inconsistency arises from data processing (Shi et al 2008), differences in sample RNA integrity markedly affect transcript quantification and likely are the cause of much of the inconsistency (Auer et al 2003;Lipska et al 2006;Atz et al 2007;Thompson et al 2007;Popova et al 2008). Sample RNA of the highest quality is therefore imperative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in an article about quality control of RNA for microarray, RIN of 7.0 was used as a cut-off value for deciding whether the RNA is suitable for microarray analysis [31]. The authors selected this value because Thompson et al showed that there was a substantial increase in the rate of false positives on the microarray when the starting RNA had a RIN value of <7.0 [32]. This may suggest the RNA obtained in our study which has RIN value of 7.5 may also be suitable for microarray analysis.…”
Section: Yields Of Rna From Rat Np Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in an article about quality control of RNA for microarray, RIN of 7.0 was used as a cut-off value for deciding whether the RNA is suitable for microarray analysis [149]. The authors selected this value because Thompson et al showed that there was a substantial increase in the rate of false positives on the microarray when the starting RNA had a RIN value of < 7.0 [150]. This may suggest the RNA obtained in our study which has RIN value of 7.5 may also be suitable for microarray analysis.…”
Section: Yield Of Rna From Rat Np Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%