2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aabd2d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the exradin W1 plastic scintillation detector for small field applications in proton therapy

Abstract: Accurate dosimetry in small field proton therapy is challenging, particularly for applications such as ocular therapy, and suitable detectors for this purpose are sought. The Exradin W1 plastic scintillating fibre detector is known to out-perform most other detectors for determining relative dose factors for small megavoltage photon beams used in radiotherapy but its potential in small proton beams has been relatively unexplored in the literature. The 1 mm diameter cylindrical geometry and near water equivalen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quenching correction parameter k B in table 1 for the BCF-12 scintillator deviates 10 % and 3 % from the results published in Wang et al (2012) and Alsanea et al (2018), respectively. The k B value for the BCF-60 scintillator is between the two values reported by Hoehr et al (2018). The Chou model in method (D) provided the best fit to the data for C 0 for the BCF scintillators, in agreement with Torrisi (2000), and C = 0 for the 81-0084 scintillator in agreement with Birks (1964).…”
Section: Scintillator Quenchingsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quenching correction parameter k B in table 1 for the BCF-12 scintillator deviates 10 % and 3 % from the results published in Wang et al (2012) and Alsanea et al (2018), respectively. The k B value for the BCF-60 scintillator is between the two values reported by Hoehr et al (2018). The Chou model in method (D) provided the best fit to the data for C 0 for the BCF scintillators, in agreement with Torrisi (2000), and C = 0 for the 81-0084 scintillator in agreement with Birks (1964).…”
Section: Scintillator Quenchingsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…(2.3). (C) By fitting the linear Birks model to the experimentally determined QCFs as a function of LET Φ for primaries and secondary protons in line with other studies (Wang et al, 2012;Hoehr et al, 2018). (D) By fitting the second-order Chou model to the QCFs as a function of LET Φ for primaries and secondary protons directly in eq.…”
Section: Comparison Of Quenching Modelsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Hence, several international organizations such as AAPM and IAEA suggested various dosimetry sensors when working under small fields. Some recent researches indicate that the suitable detectors for small field dosimetry are plastic scintillation‐based exradin W1, W2, and radiochromic films, owing to their good correction factor . However, the spatial resolution of these detectors is not yet up to the mark due to the minimum size of the sensor head requirement and radiochromic films suffer from time consuming techniques while being used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the linear energy transfer (LET) does change dramatically along the Bragg peak of proton therapy, the independence of both energy and dose rate are crucial characteristics in any new detector. Most scintillation detectors are known to exhibit increased quenching when LET increases 4,6,1217 due to the participation of alternate modes of energy dissipation in regions of high ionization density. In order to resolve the Bragg peak of the proton dose depth profile, a fiber diameter of 250 m or less may be required 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%