1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(96)01437-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the influence of fabrication methods on microstructure failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(8), from the results of experiment, we could calculate the estimated value of Fad, as it is shown in Tab.1.…”
Section: Van Der Waals Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(8), from the results of experiment, we could calculate the estimated value of Fad, as it is shown in Tab.1.…”
Section: Van Der Waals Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…fdrive (x, t) = ma sin(Qot) (3) The boundary conditions of the equation are: 8] Polysilicon surface of the cantilever beam has a thin layer oxide film after completion of the conventional micromachining process, which results in a hydrophilic surface with a high surface energy. The interfacial forces existing at the dimensions of microstructures include capillary force, electrostatic force, van der Waals force and chemical force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%