Characterizing and modeling the impact of wireless signal strength on smartphone battery drain

Abstract

Despite the tremendous market penetration of smartphones, their utility has been and will remain severely limited by their battery life. A major source of smartphone battery drain is accessing the Internet over cellular or WiFi connection when running various apps and services. Despite much anecdotal evidence of smartphone users experiencing quicker battery drain in poor signal strength, there has been limited understanding of how often smartphone users experience poor signal strength and the quantitative impact of poor signal strength on the phone battery drain. The answers to such questions are essential for diagnosing and improving cellular network services and smartphone battery life and help to build more accurate online power models for smartphones, which are building blocks for energy profiling and optimization of smartphone apps.In this paper, we conduct the first measurement and modeling study of the impact of wireless signal strength on smartphone energy consumption. Our study makes four contributions. First, through analyzing traces collected on 3785 smartphones for at least one month, we show that poor signal strength of both 3G and WiFi is routinely experienced by smartphone users, both spatially and temporally. Second, we quantify the extra energy consumption on data transfer induced by poor wireless signal strength. Third, we develop a new power model for WiFi and 3G that incorporates the signal strength factor and significantly improves the modeling accuracy over the previous state of the art. Finally, we perform what-if analysis to quantify the potential energy savings from opportunistically delaying network traffic by exploring the dynamics of signal strength experienced by users.

RSSI-Aware Energy Saving For Large File Downloading on Smartphones

“…4. Although, existing researches have shown the tail energy consumption in cellular networks and WiFi PSM (Power Saving Mode) [1], [5] and attempted to leverage the tail time in cellular networks [1], [9], to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the tail energy phenomenon caused by the closure of TCP connection in a WiFi environment is investigated. Therefore, the overhead of tail energy cannot be ignored when we consider the WiFi energy saving for downloading activities on smartphones.…”

“…Although it would be great if the smartphone users can access free WiFi wherever possible, the energy consumption of WiFi may account for more than 50% of the total device power budget under typical use [3], [4]. In addition, the measurement in [5] shows that the ratio of downloaded data to uploaded data over WiFi is about 20:1. Obviously, how to perform energy-efficient WiFi access for downloading activities is one of the key issues that may affect the smartphone's daily usage.…”

Battery Aware Video Delivery Techniques Using Rate Adaptation and Base Station Reconfiguration

“…With reference to these statistics, variable SR values less than 1 is more realistic than constant SR equal to 1. From the above results, it can be seen that MoDS significantly increases battery lifetime in the realistic scenario of variable SR. With respect to SNR, the statistics presented in [33] for signal strength (SNR) experienced by users shows that variable SNR conditions are most prevalent and also that low SNR conditions throughout video download are less likely to occur. Again, the above results show that MoDS performs best under the most prevalent case of variable SNR conditions while the loss or nominal gains under low SNR conditions are less likely to occur.…”

Efficient auto-configuration of energy-related parameters in cloud-based IoT platforms

“…For BEC, lower latency means less waiting time for server resources, which in turn means less resource utilization and finally results in less energy consumption. For DEC, latency reduction in mobile devices implies shorter durations of active wireless interfaces and hence less energy consumption ( [5] and [13] explain this for smartphones, with WLAN or 3G and LTE, respectively).…”