2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.01.450813
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing collaborative transcription regulation with a graph-based deep learning approach

Abstract: Human epigenome and transcription activities have been characterized by a number of sequence-based deep learning approaches which only utilize the DNA sequences. However, transcription factors interact with each other, and their collaborative regulatory activities go beyond the linear DNA sequence. Therefore leveraging the informative 3D chromatin organization to investigate the collaborations among transcription factors is critical. We developed ECHO, a graph-based neural network, to predict chromatin feature… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, sequence patterns generated from attribution scores reflect TF binding patterns including binding motifs and co-binding patterns. The attribution scores of genomic sequences toward TF binding reflect the important regions that contribute to TF binding prediction, which can be used to generate sequence binding patterns using TF-MoDISco [30], and these sequence patterns are able to recover TFs’ known binding motifs or reflect other sequence binding patterns such as co-binding patterns [31, 32]. From sequence patterns generated for each TF using EPCOT, we first observed that sequence patterns of some TFs recovered their known binding motifs, for example SPI1 (Fig.2e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, sequence patterns generated from attribution scores reflect TF binding patterns including binding motifs and co-binding patterns. The attribution scores of genomic sequences toward TF binding reflect the important regions that contribute to TF binding prediction, which can be used to generate sequence binding patterns using TF-MoDISco [30], and these sequence patterns are able to recover TFs’ known binding motifs or reflect other sequence binding patterns such as co-binding patterns [31, 32]. From sequence patterns generated for each TF using EPCOT, we first observed that sequence patterns of some TFs recovered their known binding motifs, for example SPI1 (Fig.2e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, sequence patterns generated from attribution scores reflect TF binding patterns including binding motifs and co-binding patterns. The attribution scores of DNA sequences toward TF binding reflect the important regions that contribute to the TF binding prediction, which can be used to generate sequence binding patterns, and these sequence patterns are able to recover TFs' known binding motifs or reflect other sequence binding patterns such as co-binding patterns [26,27,28]. From sequence patterns generated for each TF using EPCOT, we first observed that sequence patterns of some TFs recovered their known binding motifs, for example SPI1 (Fig.…”
Section: Cell-type Specific Epigenomic Feature Prediction (Efp)mentioning
confidence: 99%