Diffusion and binding-diffusion are ubiquitous processes with importance across many scales of biology. Many cellular events depend strongly on the diffusivity and binding rates of proteins and other biomolecules, which are characterized by a diffusion coefficient (D) and binding rate constants (k on , k off ). Therefore, determining the kinetic rate constants such as diffusion coefficients or binding rate constants of proteins is important to understand cell function.FRAP has been a useful technique for studying reaction-diffusion kinetics of biomolecules in cells since its development in the 1970s [1]. Classically, FRAP measurements were performed using a focused, static laser beam to bleach molecules. In recent years, commercial laser scanning confocal microscopes (LSCMs) have become widely utilized to study of intracellular protein dynamics [2,3,4]. As such, confocal FRAP can now be used to study binding-diffusion kinetics of proteins within their native environments, an important goal in light of the universality of reaction and diffusion processes in cells.In spite of the popularity of LSCM based FRAP (confocal FRAP), most FRAP models available in the literature were developed for the static laser beam based conventional FRAP approaches, which are based on two critical assumptions: 1) the bleaching time scale is much faster than protein kinetic scales so that immediate photobleaching can be assumed; and 2) the bleach region of interest (ROI) is small enough so that the compartments from which recovery occurs (for example the plasma membrane or the cytoplasm) can be considered as infinite 2D and 3D spaces.However, the 1 st assumption does not necessarily apply in confocal FRAP experiments, especially for soluble proteins, since in laser scanning confocal microscopes using a single laser for bleaching and imaging, the time required to scan the bleach region can allow for diffusion during the bleach [5]. Due to the long scanning time of confocal laser scanning microscopes, conventional FRAP analysis applied to confocal FRAP provides confounding kinetic parameter values [5]. To address this intrinsic property of confocal FRAP, we recently developed a formalism that can be used to correct for binding and/or diffusion during the photobleaching event and showed that this is a critical consideration in confocal FRAP analysis [4,5].The 2 nd assumption is also not legitimate in many cases and geometric consideration is required depending on the locations in cells where FRAP experiments are performed. Although various versions of FRAP models have been developed in the literature, to our knowledge the consequences 212