Characterizing the stocks, flows, and carbon impact of dockless sharing bikes in China

Abstract

The booming dockless sharing bikes (DSBs) in China, as a new sharing economy business model, have attracted increasing public and academic attention after 2015. The impact of DSBs development on the stocks and flows of bikes and the resource and climate consequences of shortlived DSBs, however, remain poorly understood. In this study, we characterized the stocks and flows of both DSBs and regular private bikes in China from 1950 to 2020 and evaluated the carbon cost and benefit of booming DSBs. We found China's bike consumption and stock decreased slightly after a fast development from the late 1970s and then a peak in the mid-1990s, resulting in a *Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript: Manuscript -Dockless Bikeshare in China_final_2020_6_27_clean_version.docx Click here to view linked References relatively low ownership of approximately 0.3 unit per person and 70% of production being exported in recent years. Despite a temporal boost, the unsustainable development of DSBs may affect the bike industry in the long term, because of its skyrocketing market share (from less than 1% to 80%) and short lifetime. Nevertheless, DSBs development still leads to an overall climate gain in China, due to its higher stock efficiency and potentials to substitute more carbon intensive trips. We suggest an urgent need for more empirical studies on the use (e.g., substitution ratio for other transportation models) of DSBs in China and a necessity for better management of DSB development with efforts of all relevant stakeholders.

Evaluation of public opinion regarding the changes implemented to encourage bicycle use in the city of São Paulo

“…The use of bicycles as a means of transportation can minimize the harmful effects caused by the excess of motorized vehicles in the cities, bringing benefits to the individual and to the Society (Chen et al, 2020;Mao et al, 2021). Among the advantages observed in the adoption of the bicycle as a means of transportation, the following stand out: low environmental impact and low infrastructure cost (Olekszechen, Battiston, & Kuhnen, 2016); it is more accessible, which provides greater social equality (Bacchieri et al, 2005); health benefits, such as lower risk of developing cardiovascular diseases and better cardiorespiratory fitness (Oja et al, 2011).…”

Carbon Emission Reduction by Bicycle-Sharing in China

“…In studying the substitution effect of bicycle-sharing, for instance, Kou et al explored the substitution effect in eight cities in the United States [19]. Chen and Liu et al analyzed the substitution effect of bicycle-sharing in China through the combination of the generated carbon emissions and the substitution effect [20], Chen and Zhang et al further used a case study of the bicycle-sharing system in New York to expound on the Energies 2022, 15, 5136 2 of 17 effect of gender on the substitution effect [21], and van Marsbergen et al investigated the combination of bicycle-sharing and other transportation modes for travel and thus substitution of car travel [22].…”

Assessing bikeability with street view imagery and computer vision

“…Bicycles play an important role in making cities environmentally sustainable, healthy, and economically vibrant (Neves and Brand, 2019;Cao and Shen, 2019;Rojas-Rueda et al, 2011;Volker and Handy, 2021;Wang et al, 2016;Horacek et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2019a;Yeh et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2020b;Alaoui and Tekouabou, 2021). To evaluate the extent to which cycling is facilitated, the notion of bikeability was created by complementing the concept of walkability.…”