1984
DOI: 10.1002/cber.19841170523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge‐Transfer‐Komplexe von Tetrathiafulvalen (TTF) mit 1,2,5‐Thiadiazolchinonen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Representative crystallographic studies have confirmed that the atoms of C, N, and S in the 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole core are essentially coplanar and that intramolecular bonding is well represented by quinoidal structure 1 . ,, This preference is consistent with dipole moments measured for the increasingly polarized series of analogues naphthalene, quinoxaline ( 2 ), 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole ( 1 ), and 1,2-benzoquinone ( 3 ), which are 0, 0.51, , 1.8, and 4.2 D, respectively. Previously published structural studies show that 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles can engage in various intermolecular interactions, including π-stacking, dipole–dipole interactions, C–H···π interactions, C–H···N interactions, and S···N interactions. ,, S···N interactions involving benzothiadiazoles can be considered to arise from various effects, including the electrostatic attraction of opposing partial charges and the interaction of S–N σ* orbitals with nonbonding orbitals centered on N. The strength of S···N interactions appears to be similar to that of typical hydrogen bonds and has been calculated by dispersion-corrected DFT methods to be approximately 4 kcal/mol . However, the relative importance of various interactions characteristic of 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles remains unclear, and there are no reports of extensive efforts to use these interactions to direct the crystallization of complex 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles in predetermined ways.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Representative crystallographic studies have confirmed that the atoms of C, N, and S in the 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole core are essentially coplanar and that intramolecular bonding is well represented by quinoidal structure 1 . ,, This preference is consistent with dipole moments measured for the increasingly polarized series of analogues naphthalene, quinoxaline ( 2 ), 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole ( 1 ), and 1,2-benzoquinone ( 3 ), which are 0, 0.51, , 1.8, and 4.2 D, respectively. Previously published structural studies show that 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles can engage in various intermolecular interactions, including π-stacking, dipole–dipole interactions, C–H···π interactions, C–H···N interactions, and S···N interactions. ,, S···N interactions involving benzothiadiazoles can be considered to arise from various effects, including the electrostatic attraction of opposing partial charges and the interaction of S–N σ* orbitals with nonbonding orbitals centered on N. The strength of S···N interactions appears to be similar to that of typical hydrogen bonds and has been calculated by dispersion-corrected DFT methods to be approximately 4 kcal/mol . However, the relative importance of various interactions characteristic of 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles remains unclear, and there are no reports of extensive efforts to use these interactions to direct the crystallization of complex 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles in predetermined ways.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…diazole rings. 6 As to species 3 (the following observations are also valid for species 4), the internal substantially planar 58). The hydrogen atoms associated to the nitrogen atoms and to the isoindole units were located from a difference Fourier map, while those associated to the aliphatic chains were put in geometrically calculated positions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For the search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom et al, 2016), the D-H distance was set in the interval 1.30-1.45 Å and the non-bonding distance between the donor and acceptor nitrogen atoms was set in the interval 2.6-3.0 Å . (Marsh & Clemente, 2007); (c) 2,1,3-benzoselenadiazole 2,1,3-benzoselenadiazolium pentaiodide (Gieren et al, 1985) (Heravi et al, 2005); (e) bis[(3,5-dimethylpyrazole)(3,5dimethylpyrazolyl)]platinum(II) (Umakoshi et al, 2008); (f) 4-{2-(pyridin-4-yl)oxy]-1,2bis(2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-iodophenyl)ethoxy}pyridin-1-ium iodide bis(nitrobenzene) (Martí-Rujas et al, 2012); (g) 5,6:14,15-dibenzo-1,4-dioxa-8-azonia-12-azacyclopentadeca-5,14-diene 5,6:14,15-dibenzo-1,4-dioxa-8,12-diazacyclopentadeca-5,14-diene perchlorate (Tušek-Božić et al, 2005); (h) dioxidotetrakis(4-methylpyridine)rhenium(V) 4methylpyridinium 4-methylpyridine diodide (Krawczyk et al, 2014); (i) 4-methylpyridinium trans-bis(-picoline)tetrakis(thiocyanato)molybdenum 4-methylpyridine (Kitanovski et al, 2009); (j) bis(4,4 0 -bipyridinium) hexakis( 2 -sulfido)tetragermaniumtetrasulfide 4,4 0 -bipyridine heptahydrate (Wang et al, 2003); (k) 4,4 0bipyridinium 4-(pyrid-4-yl)pyridinium 4,4 0 -bipyridine hexakis(isothiocyanato-N)-iron (Wei et al, 2002); (l) tris(2-benzimidazolylmethyl)ammonium 3,5-dinitrobenzoate 3,5dinitrobenzoic acid clathrate (Ji et al, 2004); (m) (2R,4S,5R)-9-(hydroxyimino)-6 0methoxycinchonan-1-ium (2R,4S,5R)-N-hydroxy-6 0 -methoxycinchonan-9-imine chloride methanol solvate (Zohri et al, 2015); (n) catena-[bis( 2 -aqua)-(5-cyano-2H-1,2,3triazole-4-carboxamide)(4-cyano-1,2,3-triazole-5-carboxamide)sodium] (Al-Azmi et al, 2007); (o) (1,1 0 -hydrogenbis{4-[1 0 -(4-pyridyl)ferrocen-1-yl]pyridine}) 4-[1 0 -(4-pyridyl)ferrocen-1-yl]pyridinium tris(5-carboxy-2-thienylcarboxylate) bis(thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylic acid) (Braga et al, 2008); (p) cytosinium 4-amino-2-hydroxybenzoate cytosine monohydrate (Cherukuvada et al, 2013); (q) cytosinium acetylenedicarboxylate cytosine monohydrate (Perumalla et al, 2013).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%