2013
DOI: 10.1101/gad.222992.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checkpoint kinases and the INO80 nucleosome remodeling complex enhance global chromatin mobility in response to DNA damage

Abstract: Double-strand break repair by recombination requires a homology search. In yeast, induced breaks move significantly more than undamaged loci. To examine whether DNA damage provokes an increase in chromatin mobility generally, we tracked undamaged loci under DNA-damaging conditions. We found that the yeast checkpoint factors Mec1, Rad9, and Rad53 are required for genome-wide increases in chromatin mobility, but not the repair protein Rad51. Mec1 activation by targeted Ddc1/Ddc2 enhances chromatin mobility even … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
152
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
152
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The change in mobility of the broken locus is termed "local" or "cis." Interestingly, in budding yeast, unbroken chromosomes also increase the volume that they explore after DNA damage, termed "global" or "trans" (Mine-Hattab and Rothstein 2012;Seeber et al 2013). The increase in both global and local mobility in haploid and diploid budding yeast cells is genetically controlled.…”
Section: Dsb Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The change in mobility of the broken locus is termed "local" or "cis." Interestingly, in budding yeast, unbroken chromosomes also increase the volume that they explore after DNA damage, termed "global" or "trans" (Mine-Hattab and Rothstein 2012;Seeber et al 2013). The increase in both global and local mobility in haploid and diploid budding yeast cells is genetically controlled.…”
Section: Dsb Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, both depend on the Rad51 recombinase (Dion et al 2012;Mine-Hattab and Rothstein 2012). In haploid budding yeast, the increase in local mobility depends on Rad54 as well as two checkpoint proteins, Rad9 and Mec1 (Dion et al 2012;Seeber et al 2013). In diploid cells, deletion of SAE2, which likely causes a delayed appearance of ssDNA, also delays the increase in local chromosome mobility (Mine-Hattab and Rothstein 2012).…”
Section: Dsb Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the concerted activity of the DDR and remodelers is not restricted to the site of DNA damage. Checkpoint activation, even in the absence of damage, leads to a more generalized increase in chromatin mobility that was dependent on Mec1 and its downstream target kinase Rad53 [36,43] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: The Mobility Of Dna Dsbsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recent results implicate two nucleosome remodelers (INO80-C and SWR-C) in regulating this chromatin mobility and in the association of DNA damage with perinuclear sites [30,[35][36][37]. It is thus relevant to review chromatin dynamics in terms of local nucleosome composition, chromatin compaction and the precise position of the locus within the nuclear sphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We now explore the consequences of chromatin reorganization after DSB induction, where the dynamics of a chromatin locus in the proximity of the break is modified [19]. The changes are revealed by the subdiffusion behavior.…”
Section: Following Polymer Decompaction the Local Search Time Decmentioning
confidence: 99%