2020
DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2019.1708064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checkpoint molecules coordinately restrain hyperactivated effector T cells in the tumor microenvironment

Abstract: The immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) immunotherapy has prolonged overall survival for cancer patients but the response rates are low. The resistance to ICB is likely due to compensatory upregulation of additional immune inhibitory molecules. In this study, we first systematically examined Tim-3 expression in immune cells in mouse tumors and found that Tim-3 was specifically up-regulated in a large number of Treg, conventional CD4 + , CD8 + T cells, dendritic cell 1 (DC1), and macrophage 1 (M1) in the tumor mic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accumulating preclinical evidence documents the relevance of STING signaling in malignant cells and innate immune effectors of the tumor microenvironment for the initiation of anticancer immunity. [69][70][71] Initially, it has been proposed that the engulfment of dying cancer cells by tumor-infiltrating CD8α + DCs would trigger STING signaling in the latter, culminating in the abundant secretion of type I IFN and consequent activation of autocrine and paracrine pathways supporting the crosspriming of tumor-specific CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] Consistent with this model, Sting1 −/mice are unable to mount efficient T cell immunity against syngeneic melanomas 57 and gliomas, 80 correlating with deficient type I IFN production.…”
Section: Sting Signaling In Preclinical Tumor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulating preclinical evidence documents the relevance of STING signaling in malignant cells and innate immune effectors of the tumor microenvironment for the initiation of anticancer immunity. [69][70][71] Initially, it has been proposed that the engulfment of dying cancer cells by tumor-infiltrating CD8α + DCs would trigger STING signaling in the latter, culminating in the abundant secretion of type I IFN and consequent activation of autocrine and paracrine pathways supporting the crosspriming of tumor-specific CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] Consistent with this model, Sting1 −/mice are unable to mount efficient T cell immunity against syngeneic melanomas 57 and gliomas, 80 correlating with deficient type I IFN production.…”
Section: Sting Signaling In Preclinical Tumor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4c). There are several immune checkpoint genes including VTCN1, VISTA, LAG3, IDO1, IDO2 and TIM3 [32][33][34] that are emerging in the development of immunotherapy, and we compared the expressions of these genes between the immune subtypes. The patterns of differences between expressions across 7 cancers were inconsistent.…”
Section: Immune-competent Subtypes In 7 Cancer Types Demonstrated Difmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exhausted T cells are a type of hyper activated effector cells characterized by expression of co-inhibitory receptors including PD-1, Tim-3, and Lag-3 ( Fourcade et al, 2010 ; Sakuishi et al, 2010 ; Wherry, 2011 ; Gao et al, 2012 ; Yang et al, 2020 ). Eomes has been associated with T cell exhaustion state ( Doering et al, 2012 ; Paley et al, 2012 ; Li et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%