2010
DOI: 10.1038/embor.2010.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checkpoint recovery after DNA damage: a rolling stop for CDKs

Abstract: The cell cycle machinery has to be arrested for efficient repair of DNA damage. A paper in this issue of EMBO reports demonstrates that residual CDK activity is nevertheless required during arrest for activation of FoxM1, which is essential for cell‐cycle progression after the damage has been repaired.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea is in line with a recent report (29) revealing that cyclin A-CDK activity has to be maintained to a certain level during the establishment of the checkpoint to allow the activation of FoxM1, a transcription factor whose activity is critical for the recovery (30). Our findings suggest a model in which DN-CDC25B would be dedicated variants of CDC25B that would keep the cyclin A-CDK activity above a critical threshold required for the resumption of the cell-cycle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This idea is in line with a recent report (29) revealing that cyclin A-CDK activity has to be maintained to a certain level during the establishment of the checkpoint to allow the activation of FoxM1, a transcription factor whose activity is critical for the recovery (30). Our findings suggest a model in which DN-CDC25B would be dedicated variants of CDC25B that would keep the cyclin A-CDK activity above a critical threshold required for the resumption of the cell-cycle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Control of cell cycle dynamics is a likely mechanism by which nutrient status affects proliferation. Cells exit the cell cycle for a variety of reasons, including G0 cell cycle exit for differentiation, or irreversible G2 arrest in response to DNA damage (Barnum and O'Connell, 2014;DiPaola, 2002;Duursma and Cimprich, 2010) or viral infection (Bressy et al, 2019;Davy and Doorbar, 2007). Dividing cells typically pause for some period in G0, pending signals that regulate progression into G1 and subsequent cell division or terminal differentiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we measured their effect on checkpoint recovery competence in cells depleted for p53. Whereas transformed cells like U2OS maintain the competence to recover, primary RPE1 cells lose this ability rather quickly, which makes RPE1 the more representative cell model to study this cell fate-determining response [36,37]. While studying the recovery competence after co-depletion of p53 in RPE1 cells, we found that similar to the PPM1D-positive control, depletion of PHF3, RBBP6, RAD54L, KAT5, SMC3, PHF6, LIN9, TAF12, SMC1, NIPBL, ACTL6A, TRRAP, and RAD21 affected recovery in a p53dependent manner, indicating the involvement of these genes in the regulation of DNA damage-induced p53 activation ( Fig 2B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%