2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and sensory differences between high price and low price extra virgin olive oils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a tendency towards higher concentrations in commercially-blended than in PDO EVOO was noted for the majority of FFAs, statistically significant differences were found only for linolenic acid. Such a result was, to some extent, in accordance with a previous study in which low-priced EVOO samples were found to contain more FFAs than EVOOs of higher price [34]. FFA content was previously shown to increase during olive oil storage and aging [35,36].…”
Section: Lc-esi-ms/ms Analysis Of Free Fatty Acids Fatty Acid Methylsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a tendency towards higher concentrations in commercially-blended than in PDO EVOO was noted for the majority of FFAs, statistically significant differences were found only for linolenic acid. Such a result was, to some extent, in accordance with a previous study in which low-priced EVOO samples were found to contain more FFAs than EVOOs of higher price [34]. FFA content was previously shown to increase during olive oil storage and aging [35,36].…”
Section: Lc-esi-ms/ms Analysis Of Free Fatty Acids Fatty Acid Methylsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Monocultivar PDO Commercially-Blended The differences between the two EVOO classes with respect to average TAG composition were not large ( Table 2). TAG composition is not evaluated among the parameters related to EVOO sensory quality, while a part of EVOO nutritional value linked to TAGs, related mainly to the FA unsaturation level, depends mostly on cultivar, geographical origin and fruit ripening degree [9][10][11]34]. The differences between the two classes of EVOO, observed for a relatively small number of TAG species, could be primarily ascribed to the abovementioned factors.…”
Section: Origin/classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the highest content and MOG is one of the two with the lowest content. Considering the whole of the MEVOOs investigated, their average content of the phenolic substances considered by the health claim, is higher as compared to levels reported for EVOO blends commonly found in the large retail distribution market (supermarket) [24,25]. Interesting information to fingerprint the different varieties were provided mostly by minor phenolics, like phenolic acids, lignans, and flavonoids, which seem to be more characteristic for the cvs.…”
Section: Polar Phenolic Substancesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Attributes evaluated were fruity, bitter, and pungent. However, others like e.g., the attributes of leaves/grass, artichoke/cardoon, almond, tomato, berries as well as the total score represent an indication of the overall sensory quality of the oil [25]. The oils investigated showed a generally higher level of quality in 2015 as compared to 2016 whereas, for each of the cvs.…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We can speculate that this property could result in more efficient control of plasma membrane protein activity, and hence it could also impact cellular and nuclear responses. EVO and NS oils have previously been evaluated for their chemical composition and antioxidants properties [30,47] and significant differences have been identified; total antioxidant activity, DPPH radical-scavenging activity, superoxide scavenging activity and catalase-like activity were +77%, +62%, +90%, +98% and +91% higher in EVOO than in NS oil [30]. The higher antioxidant properties of EVOO can be explained by the much higher concentration of the most active tocopherol (α-tocopherol), found in EVOO at 284 mg kg −1 and in NS oil at 27 mg kg −1 [31,47] and to the presence many other strong antioxidants in EVOO such as tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol and secoiridoid derivatives found in relatively high concentration and absent in NS oil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%