2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(02)00752-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical factors that influence the performance of mine sulphidic paste backfill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They used four samples from three different mines located in Canada, which were mixed with four types of binders and six different types of mixing water chemical characteristics. It was found that the mixing water is an important parameter that affects the quality of the paste backfill mass and that, in contrast to the Portland cement based binder, slag-based binder hydration seems to be inhibited by the presence of soluble sulphates [13]. The results of this study clearly demonstrated the inefficiency of choosing paste backfill mixtures without testing first the tailings and mixing water characteristics.…”
Section: Mine Tailings As Construction Materialsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…They used four samples from three different mines located in Canada, which were mixed with four types of binders and six different types of mixing water chemical characteristics. It was found that the mixing water is an important parameter that affects the quality of the paste backfill mass and that, in contrast to the Portland cement based binder, slag-based binder hydration seems to be inhibited by the presence of soluble sulphates [13]. The results of this study clearly demonstrated the inefficiency of choosing paste backfill mixtures without testing first the tailings and mixing water characteristics.…”
Section: Mine Tailings As Construction Materialsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Pastes prepared with brines and fly ash A significantly exceeded a minimum UCS of 200 kPa suggested by Potvin et al (2005) for mine backfill. Mahlaba (2007) showed that the pH of paste remained high even when acidic brines were used due to high alkalinity of fly ash which agrees with its use of neutralising acid mine drainage Gitari et al, 2006;Shang and Wang, 2005;Benzaazoua et al, 2002;Fester et al, 2008). The distinction exhibited by two fly ashes was attributed to the mineralogical differences especially lime deficiency and lower content of the amorphous phase in fly ash B (Ward and French, 2006;Donahoe, 2004).…”
Section: Unconfined Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The socalled high water refers to water volume content accounted for more than 95% of the total volume, and the 95% water volume is called common material [15][16][17] . Material consists of main material (A material, B material), subsidiary material (AA material, BB material).…”
Section: A Interpolation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%