The
ionic conductivity, bend strength, and electrochemical performance
in a seawater battery (SWB) of an Na3.1Zr1.55Si2.3P0.7O11 (vA-NASICON) solid
electrolyte were compared to those of Na3Zr2Si2PO12 (H-NASICON). vA-NASICON exhibited three
times higher total ionic conductivity (8.6 × 10–4 S/cm) than H-NASICON (2.9 × 10–4 S/cm). This
is due to the higher bulk ionic conductivity and lower grain boundary
resistance of vA-NASICON. The higher bulk conductivity of vA-NASICON
is a result of its higher Na content, leading to a larger concentration
of charge carriers and/or the formation of a higher conductive rhombohedral
phase. The lower grain boundary resistance of vA-NASICON is a result
of its larger grain size and reduced ZrO2 content. The
bend strength of vA-NASICON (95 MPa) was 30% higher than that of the
H-NASICON ceramic. The higher bend strength of vA-NASICON was attributed
to its reduced ZrO2 secondary phase (1.1 vol %) compared
to that of H-NASICON (2.6 vol %). When the vA-NASICON ceramic was
tested in the SWB as a solid electrolyte, an 8.27% improved voltage
efficiency and 81% higher power output were demonstrated, compared
to those of H-NASICON, as a result of its higher total ionic conductivity
and mechanical strength. At the same time, the vA-NASICON membrane
revealed comparable cycle life (1000 h) to that of H-NASICON. These
results suggest that vA-NASICON can be a better alternative than H-NASICON
for use in the SWB.