2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.04.236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters are efficient even at subclavian sites without tracheostomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Lorente et al . ). Two systematic reviews evaluating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found an overall significant difference between antimicrobial‐impregnated and standard CVCs in the rates of catheter colonization and catheter‐related bloodstream infection (CRBI) (Lai et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Lorente et al . ). Two systematic reviews evaluating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found an overall significant difference between antimicrobial‐impregnated and standard CVCs in the rates of catheter colonization and catheter‐related bloodstream infection (CRBI) (Lai et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is important to highlight that in vivo and in vitro studies are different models to study biofilm physiology and both have progressively contributed to the current knowledge of this field. Clinical and in vitro studies have demonstrated that antimicrobial-impregnated devices are effective (O'Grady et al 2011;Naparstek et al 2014), although their efficiency and durability against various micro-organisms, especially multidrug-resistant bacteria and to biofilm, are scarcely discussed (Jamal et al 2014a;Lorente et al 2016). Two systematic reviews evaluating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found an overall significant difference between antimicrobial-impregnated and standard CVCs in the rates of catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBI) (Lai et al 2016;Wang et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical studies have demonstrated CRBSI reduction with chlorhexidine-treated PICCs and CICCs. [19][20][21][22][23] Chlorhexidine-treated PICCs (CH-PICCs) have also been shown to lessen catheter-related thrombus also demonstrating anti-thrombogenic effectiveness when challenged with Gram-positive bacterial infection in a similar ovine model. 24 Chlorhexidine minimizes thrombus accumulation on catheter surfaces by the inhibition of thrombin, which in turn inhibits the final step in the clotting cascade pathway, that is, the conversion of fibrinogen to a fibrin clot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were prompted by the Michigan Keystone project published in 2006 by Pronovost [40]. These measures included maximum sterile barrier precautions, aseptic insertion technique, chlorhexidine skin preparation, transparent dressings, and removal of the catheter as soon as clinically possible [40][41][42]. It was also determined that the routine exchange of catheters for infection prevention was not necessary and may cause contamination [40,42].…”
Section: Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (Clabsi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased interest and financial considerations have also led to device innovations for infection reduction. These include alcohol impregnated caps for the covering of hubs, and the development of antimicrobial-impregnated CVC with both internal and external surface impregnation [41,42].…”
Section: Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (Clabsi)mentioning
confidence: 99%