2015
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmv170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatographic Determination of Aminoacridine Hydrochloride, Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Lidocaine Toxic Impurity in Oral Gel

Abstract: Two sensitive and selective analytical methods were developed for simultaneous determination of aminoacridine hydrochloride and lidocaine hydrochloride in bulk powder and pharmaceutical formulation. Method A was based on HPLC separation of the cited drugs with determination of the toxic lidocaine-related impurity 2,6-dimethylaniline. The separation was achieved using reversed-phase column C18, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm particle size and mobile phase consisting of 0.05 M disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate (pH 6.0 ±… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method demonstrated to be very sensitive, as indicated by the low values (below 1 mg L −1 ) of the LOQ obtained. These LOQs were lower or comparable to those reported in previous works using CE [33,36,37,43], HPLC [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], and electrochemical detection [23,[25][26][27]. The intra-day precision was assessed by analyzing in triplicate (in the same day) six different samples of pharmaceutical formulations (three samples containing LD and other three with BZ).…”
Section: Validation Of the Ce-uv Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed method demonstrated to be very sensitive, as indicated by the low values (below 1 mg L −1 ) of the LOQ obtained. These LOQs were lower or comparable to those reported in previous works using CE [33,36,37,43], HPLC [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], and electrochemical detection [23,[25][26][27]. The intra-day precision was assessed by analyzing in triplicate (in the same day) six different samples of pharmaceutical formulations (three samples containing LD and other three with BZ).…”
Section: Validation Of the Ce-uv Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In addition to HPLC methods of analysis for determination of LD and BZ in pharmaceutical formulations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], analytical methods based on electrochemical [23][24][25][26][27] and spectrophotometric [28][29][30][31] detections have also been reported in the literature. Beyond quantification of LD in pharmaceutical formulations [32][33][34][35], CE has also been applied for the determination of this anesthetic in urine [36][37][38], human plasma [39,40], human serum [41,42], vitreous humor [43], and seized cocaine [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective and/or simultaneous quantitation of LH and DMA was described using TLC, 4 ISE 29 and HPLC. [30][31][32] As far as to our Knowledge simultaneous determination of LH and DMA has not yet been reported in the literature using voltammetry. Accordingly, the current work was planned to introduce a simple, accurate and sensitive voltammetric method for the assay of LH and DMA simultaneously in their marketed formulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Adsorptive stripping voltammetry at a static mercury dropping electrode has been used for acridine assessment [8]. Reversed phase HPLC, TLC and GLC have been utilized for separation and quantitation of aminoacridine [9,10] and spectrophotometric and fluorimetric methods for aminoacridine determination [11,12]. Most of these methods suffer from lack of selectivity and sensitivity or involved several time consuming manipulation steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%