2019
DOI: 10.3390/catal9040335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromium-Ruthenium Oxides Supported on Gamma-Alumina as an Alternative Catalyst for Partial Combustion of Methane

Abstract: Catalyst screening of γ-Al2O3-supported, single-metal and bimetallic catalysts revealed several bimetallic catalysts with activities for partial combustion of methane greater than a benchmark Pt/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. A cost analysis of those catalysts identified that the (2 wt%Cr + 3 wt% Ru)/γ-Al2O3 catalyst, denoted as 2Cr3Ru/Al2O3, was about 17.6 times cheaper than the benchmark catalyst and achieved a methane conversion of 10.50% or 1.6 times higher than the benchmark catalyst based on identical catalyst weight… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these surface science studies it is quite surprising that pure RuO 2 is active at all in methane combustion. But the observed activity of RuO 2 is consistent with a recent study where RuO 2 supported on Gamma Alumina was discussed as alternative catalyst for methane combustion [40] …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From these surface science studies it is quite surprising that pure RuO 2 is active at all in methane combustion. But the observed activity of RuO 2 is consistent with a recent study where RuO 2 supported on Gamma Alumina was discussed as alternative catalyst for methane combustion [40] …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…But the observed activity of RuO 2 is consistent with a recent study where RuO 2 supported on Gamma Alumina was discussed as alternative catalyst for methane combustion. [40] Pure RuO 2 (110) is, however, known to be an excellent catalyst in the CO oxidation reaction, [22] while on IrO 2 (110) the adsorption of CO was found to be much stronger than on RuO 2 . [41] In fact, RuO 2 has shown to be more active in the CO oxidation than IrO 2 .…”
Section: Methane Combustion Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the CH 4 : O 2 ratio of 2 is the stoichiometric number of the partial oxidation of the methane reaction that generally produces high CO and H 2 , 15 which further react to produce light hydrocarbons. 43 In the current study, the amount of oxygen used in the feed was lower than that of methane because the complete oxidation of methane was favored, 44 and there were safety concerns due to the flammability limit 45 and explosion risk in the reactor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%