2015
DOI: 10.7554/elife.05068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome mis-segregation and cytokinesis failure in trisomic human cells

Abstract: Cancer cells display aneuploid karyotypes and typically mis-segregate chromosomes at high rates, a phenotype referred to as chromosomal instability (CIN). To test the effects of aneuploidy on chromosome segregation and other mitotic phenotypes we used the colorectal cancer cell line DLD1 (2n = 46) and two variants with trisomy 7 or 13 (DLD1+7 and DLD1+13), as well as euploid and trisomy 13 amniocytes (AF and AF+13). We found that trisomic cells displayed higher rates of chromosome mis-segregation compared to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
21
16
9
5

Citation Types

5
92
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
81
32
25
16

Relationship

7
90

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(125 reference statements)
5
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility that we are currently exploring is that this reflects an adaptive response to loss of p38α function during the clonal expansion following the CRISPR/Cas9 process. Another possibility is that aneuploidy induced by loss of p38 may predispose cells to cytokinesis failure, a phenomenon described in trisomic DLD-1 cells ( Nicholson et al., 2015 ). Nevertheless, it raises the possibility that post-mitotic survival of p38α null cells is a consequence of avoiding aneuploidy by becoming tetraploid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two identified clusters could potentially be regulating genes on other chromosomes. Nicholson and colleagues found that the overexpression of one gene, SPG20 , expressed in cluster 13q13.3, promotes cytokinesis failure in the DLD-1 + 13 cells [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is associated with an increase in the concentration of the spartin protein, which is localized in centrosomes and microtubules during mitosis. The SPG20 gene encoding this protein is located on chromosome 13 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first glance, this result contradicts with experimentally observed increased missegregation of various aneuploid karyotypes (Ganem et al, 2009; Lengauer et al, 1997; Thompson and Compton, 2008). Although missegregation of aneuploid karyotype is generally increased, different aneuploid karyotypes are characterized by various missegregation rates (Hintzen et al, 2021; Nicholson et al, 2015b). Our theoretical result, in combination with these experimental findings, suggests that those cells with lower missegregation will be selected among different aneuploid karyotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of key processes which drives karyotype evolution is chromosome missegregation, which is increased for many tumor karyotypes and termed chromosome instability (CIN) (Hintzen et al, 2021; Nicholson & Cimini, 2013; Thompson & Compton, 2008). Missegregation includes gain or loss of one or a few chromosomes due to incorrect attachment of chromosomes to the mitotic spindle (Bakhoum et al, 2009; Cimini, 2008; Dewhurst et al, 2014; Nicholson et al, 2015; Thompson & Compton, 2011b). Another key process for karyotype evolution is cell proliferation, which determines how the total number of cells with a certain karyotype changes over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More ambiguously, the RAB18-interacting microtubule-binding proteins have not previously been reported to work together but do function in compatible locations. SPG20 and CAMSAP1 each associate with mitotic spindle poles, REEP4 participates in spindle-dependent ER clearance from metaphase chromatin, and BICD2 is a component of the minus-end-directed dynein–dynactin motor complex ( 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ). Our TRAPPII-dependent RAB18 interaction data indicate that different GEF complexes affect largely distinct subsets of interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first glance, this result contradicts experimentally observed increased missegregation of various aneuploid karyotypes ( 11 , 39 , 40 ). Although missegregation of aneuploid karyotype is generally increased, different aneuploid karyotypes are characterized by various missegregation rates ( 27 , 29 ). Our theoretical result, in combination with these experimental findings, suggests that those cells with lower missegregation will be selected among different aneuploid karyotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of key processes that drives karyotype evolution is chromosome missegregation, which is increased for many tumor karyotypes and termed chromosome instability (CIN) ( 11 , 26 , 27 ). Missegregation includes gain or loss of one or a few chromosomes due to incorrect attachment of chromosomes to the mitotic spindle ( 9 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ). Another key process for karyotype evolution is cell proliferation, which determines how the total number of cells with a certain karyotype changes over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results limit the range within which erroneous attachments are efficiently eliminated between approximately 80% and 180% (approximately −0.1 and 0.25 respectively, on a base 10 logarithmic scale) of the Aurora A expression level used to reproduce the oscillation observed in normal cells. Despite these values are merely a stipulation of what the real range could be, our model suggests that Aurora A inhibition as well as its upregulation, like the condition observed in cancer cells (Ertych et al, 2014;He et al, 2014;Nicholson et al, 2015;Kao et al, 2017), leads to deficient erroneous attachment correction, and consequently to chromosome missegregation and CIN. Although further considerations and new parameters will fade the gap between simulation and reality, our model provides a framework to understand the relevance of Aurora A expression level on the error correction mechanism and chromosome dynamics.…”
Section: Uni-dimensional and Bi-dimensional Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…"In agreement with previous work (Nicholson et al, 2015), the trisomic clones showed similar aberrations, albeit to a lesser extent (Supplemental Figure S2B). "…”
Section: Citation Statement Classification Explanationmentioning
(Expert classified)
“…Such enriched citation information is more informative than a traditional citation index. For example, when Viganó et al (2018) cites Nicholson et al (2015), traditional citation indices report this citation by displaying the title of the citing paper and other bibliographic information such as the journal, year published, and other metadata .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, human cells with extra chromosomes were shown to have replicative defects because of down-regulation of the helicase, MCM2-7, and importantly, these aneuploid cells were found to be genomically unstable (Passerini et al, 2016). Similar experiments on trisomic colorectal cancer cells also show that these aneuploid cells mis-segregate chromosomes at a higher rate than the control diploids (Nicholson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Frozen hMSCs P9 previously cultured along four passages in FBS, frozen hMSCs P9 previously cultured along four passages in SCC + bFGF + TGFβ1 on Fn and frozen hMSCs P4 (input cells) were quickly thawed in superfrost ultra plus slides (Thermo Scientific, Life Technologies, CA, USA) and cultured for 24 hr. FISH analysis of interphase nuclei was performed as previously described (Nicholson et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%