Recent Trends in Cytogenetic Studies - Methodologies and Applications 2012
DOI: 10.5772/35890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomes as Tools for Discovering Biodiversity – The Case of Erythrinidae Fish Family

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, cytogenetic evidence largely supports the geographic restriction of the mitochondrial lineage (ABZ3047 and Group 1) from Guiana Shield suggested by DNA Barcoding data. In particular, the karyomorph F from populations of Suriname is shared only with populations of Amazon and northern Atlantic drainages rivers of Brazil [ 100 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, cytogenetic evidence largely supports the geographic restriction of the mitochondrial lineage (ABZ3047 and Group 1) from Guiana Shield suggested by DNA Barcoding data. In particular, the karyomorph F from populations of Suriname is shared only with populations of Amazon and northern Atlantic drainages rivers of Brazil [ 100 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition is even more remarkable for freshwater fishes since their dispersal can be limited and often confined to isolated hydrographic systems [ 5 ]. Such a situation is particularly true for the Erythrinidae family, in which intra-specific chromosomal differentiation has been highlighted for several of its representatives [ 6 , 7 ]. A significant amount of cytogenetic data highlight the diversity displayed by populations of its three genera, including karyotypes with different diploid numbers (2n), chromosomal morphology, and sex chromosome systems, some of which are already well differentiated while others display an early stage of differentiation [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, chromosomal mapping of specific sequences using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which enhances the detection of homeologous regions in the genomes of different species [reviewed in Cioffi and Bertollo, 2012], is still restricted in Gobiidae [Mandrioli et al, 2001;Ocalewicz and Sapota, 2011] and has only recently been applied in population analyses [Li-ma-Filho et al, 2012]. In some fish groups, repetitive sequences have shown abrupt evolutionary modifications, with marked differentiation even among closely related species [Mantovani et al, 2004;Abel et al, 2006], whereas in other groups they do not seem to play an obvious role in the diversification of the karyotype [Molina, 2007;Motta-Neto et al, 2011].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%