2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromospherically young, kinematically old stars

Abstract: Abstract.We have investigated a group of stars known to have low chromospheric ages, but high kinematical ages. Isochrone, chemical and lithium ages are estimated for them. The majority of stars in this group show lithium abundances much smaller than expected for their chromospheric ages, which is interpreted as an indication of their old age. Radial velocity measurements in the literature also show that they are not close binaries. The results suggest that they can be formed from the coalescence of short-peri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(86 reference statements)
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed dispersion depends critically on the samples considered, and from the results by Evardsson et al (1993) and Feltzing et al (2001), a relatively large dispersion of about 0.3 dex was estimated for the [Fe/H] ratio. Our own results indicate that the actual dispersion may be considerably lower, about 0.2 dex (Rocha-Pinto et al 2000, provided some important corrections are made, concerning the cosmic scatter, incompleteness of the samples and a careful analysis of stars that present contradictory age indicators, as discussed in detail by Rocha-Pinto et al (2002). This value agrees very well with our estimate of the formal uncertainty, as discussed above.…”
Section: 1c Uncertainty Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The observed dispersion depends critically on the samples considered, and from the results by Evardsson et al (1993) and Feltzing et al (2001), a relatively large dispersion of about 0.3 dex was estimated for the [Fe/H] ratio. Our own results indicate that the actual dispersion may be considerably lower, about 0.2 dex (Rocha-Pinto et al 2000, provided some important corrections are made, concerning the cosmic scatter, incompleteness of the samples and a careful analysis of stars that present contradictory age indicators, as discussed in detail by Rocha-Pinto et al (2002). This value agrees very well with our estimate of the formal uncertainty, as discussed above.…”
Section: 1c Uncertainty Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this case, radial velocity variations caused by what is now a white dwarf companion are also expected. Although these properties may be found individually in normal stars, their presence alone is not an indication of the blue straggler status; when they all occur together, however, it is a strong sign in favor of this scenario (Rocha-Pinto et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Finally, Rocha-Pinto et al (2002) classifies ε Indi A as a "chromospherically young, kinematically old" star based on the disagreement between the age from activity indicators and the observed space velocities. They find a chromospheric age of 0.39 Gyr, but note that ε Indi A has no obvious Li i absorption line and so argue that it is an older star than activity suggests.…”
Section: Age Of the ε Indi Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%