2014
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic water stress reduces tree growth and the carbon sink of deciduous hardwood forests

Abstract: Predicted decreases in water availability across the temperate forest biome have the potential to offset gains in carbon (C) uptake from phenology trends, rising atmospheric CO2 , and nitrogen deposition. While it is well established that severe droughts reduce the C sink of forests by inducing tree mortality, the impacts of mild but chronic water stress on forest phenology and physiology are largely unknown. We quantified the C consequences of chronic water stress using a 13-year record of tree growth (n = 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
123
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
123
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that measured negative growth relationships with high spring (P. ponderosa) and fall (P. contorta) temperatures may be related to an extended growing season. These high temperature patterns may lengthen the growing season and increase water stress (in the absence of significant summer rainfall) ultimately decreasing total carbon assimilated and/or increasing use of stored carbon (Oberhuber et al 2011, Brzostek et al 2014. Hu et al (2010) found that longer growing seasons decreased forest productivity in Colorado Front Range subalpine forests due to increased water stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that measured negative growth relationships with high spring (P. ponderosa) and fall (P. contorta) temperatures may be related to an extended growing season. These high temperature patterns may lengthen the growing season and increase water stress (in the absence of significant summer rainfall) ultimately decreasing total carbon assimilated and/or increasing use of stored carbon (Oberhuber et al 2011, Brzostek et al 2014. Hu et al (2010) found that longer growing seasons decreased forest productivity in Colorado Front Range subalpine forests due to increased water stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then multiplied daily exudation rates by the number of days in the growing season in 2013 (200 days) derived from measurements of canopy phenology in a nearby forest with similar tree species (the Morgan Monroe State Forest; Brzostek et al, 2014). To account for the relative abundance of trees at GW, we used a weighted average based on the average exudation rate for AM and ECM trees, and the relative abundance of AM (57% of the basal area) and ECM trees (43% of the basal area) in 30 randomly located 15 m  15 m plots at GW.…”
Section: Calculations and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water deficit has been reported as one of the major triggering factors of forest growth decline, dieback, and tree mortality [3][4][5]. Droughts reduce radial growth and alter the hydraulic conductivity of trees [6][7][8], with a negative impact on carbon sequestration [9,10] and forest productivity [11,12]. Moreover, given that aridity is expected to intensify in the future in many forested areas, this may have negative and long-term implications on forest productivity [7,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%