2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.02.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CIGS absorber layer with double grading Ga profile for highly efficient solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many research works have highlighted the positive influence of band gap profiling in CIGS structures on the generation and collection of minority carriers. Lafuente-Sampietro et al studied the impact of double grading on the charge-carrier transport of a CIGS-based PV cell. It is shown that by a judicious choice of the notch position of the conduction band, the double grading allows benefiting from the advantages of both front grading and back grading. , An efficiency of 19.83% was recorded for a 2 μm thick absorber coat. However, the effects of reducing depth of the active layer on charge-carrier transport efficiency were not evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many research works have highlighted the positive influence of band gap profiling in CIGS structures on the generation and collection of minority carriers. Lafuente-Sampietro et al studied the impact of double grading on the charge-carrier transport of a CIGS-based PV cell. It is shown that by a judicious choice of the notch position of the conduction band, the double grading allows benefiting from the advantages of both front grading and back grading. , An efficiency of 19.83% was recorded for a 2 μm thick absorber coat. However, the effects of reducing depth of the active layer on charge-carrier transport efficiency were not evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown that by a judicious choice of the notch position of the conduction band, the double grading allows benefiting from the advantages of both front grading and back grading. 19 , 20 An efficiency of 19.83% was recorded for a 2 μm thick absorber coat. However, the effects of reducing depth of the active layer on charge-carrier transport efficiency were not evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bandgap grading is an approach used to enhance the performance of CIGS-based solar cells, which is achieved by incorporating Ga content during the absorber layer deposition. Replacing In content with Ga content changes the absorber bandgap and electron affinity due to the shift in the conduction band edge [17,18]. Bandgap engineering is beneficial as it helps in reducing recombination losses (i.e., improving V OC ) and enhancing carrier collection (i.e., enhancing J SC ), which improves solar cell performance [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the increasing need for human to get cheap energy for generating electricity, designing solar cells with lower cost and higher efficiency is highly important (Ullah et al , 2014). In comparison to crystalline silicon solar cells, manufacturing of thin film solar cells, especially “Cu(In, Ga)Se 2 solar cell” is more cost-effective (Saadat et al , 2016; Mostefaoui et al , 2015; Benmir and Aida, 2013; Rajan et al , 2018). Copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) has numerous advantages, namely, high absorption coefficient throughout visible spectrum and tunable bandgap energy, ranging from 1.04 e V to 1.68 e V (Benmir and Aida, 2013; Doriani et al , 2015; Rampino et al , 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CIGS solar cell has come to mass production, it needs further optimization to gain enhanced efficiency cells and low-cost fabrication process. Various factors may contribute to increase the efficiency of CIGS cells, namely, thickness of layers (Benmir and Aida, 2013), bandgap engineering, especially for absorbing layers (Saadat et al , 2016; Doriani et al , 2015), adding a second absorbing layer (Yang et al , 2008), using various materials as absorbing or buffer layers (Benmir and Aida, 2013), doping density and temperature (Benabbas et al , 2014; Mezghache and Hadjoudja, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%