The translation of basic insight in immunological mechanisms underlying inflammation into clinical practice of inflammatory diseases is still challenging. Here we describe how-through continuous dialogue between bench and bedside-immunological knowledge translates into tangible clinical use in a complex inflammatory disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Systemic JIA (sJIA) is an autoinflammatory disease, leading to the very successful use of IL-1 antagonists. Further immunological studies identified new immune markers for diagnosis, prediction of complications, response to and successful withdrawal of therapy. Myeloid related protein (MRP)8, MRP14, S100A12, and Interleukin-18 are already used daily in clinic as markers for active sJIA. For non-sJIA subtypes, HLA-B27, antinuclear-antibodies, rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and Creactive protein are still used for classification, prognosis or active disease. MRP8, MRP14, and S100A12 are now under study for clinical practice. We believe that with biomarkers, algorithms can soon be designed for the individual risk of disease, complications, damage, prediction of response to, and successful withdrawal of therapy. In that way, less time will be lost and less pain will be suffered by the patients. In this review, we describe the current status of immunological biomarkers used in diagnosis and treatment of JIA.Keywords: Biomarkers r Classification r Juvenile arthritis r Prognosis r Recurrence
IntroductionJuvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common occurring chronic rheumatic disease in childhood with incidence rates varying from 1.6 to 23 and prevalence from 3.8 to 400 per 100 000 in the European population in 2010 [1]. JIA is a complex inflammatory disease with a multifactorial immune pathogenesis. Next to a certain genetic predisposition, environmental factors play a role leading to a chronic inflammatory response, which involves uncontrolled activation of both innate and adaptive immunities [2]. The resulting autoimmune assault targets primarily, though not excluCorrespondence: Dr. Joost F. Swart e-mail: jswart@umcutrecht.nl sively, synovial tissue, leading to chronic arthritis. The treatment for a patient with JIA nowadays still starts with low-dose or nonaggressive therapies and will only be escalated if it is failing after several months [3]. This leads to therapy failures of at least 50% in the first six months of treatment resulting in frustration, pain, and probably even damage to the treated tissue [4]. JIA patients would benefit from personalized treatment in which the individual prediction on therapy-response to certain drugs is taken into account in the choice of the anti-rheumatic therapy. As will be discussed below, over the past decade an increased understanding of the immunological mechanisms underlying JIA has led to the identification of immune biomarkers that can actually guide therapeutic strategies.Clinically, JIA therefore is defined as arthritis of unknown origin that starts before the age of 16, and persists...