2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40965-018-0055-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CityGML Application Domain Extension (ADE): overview of developments

Abstract: The Application Domain Extension (ADE) is a built-in mechanism of CityGML to augment its data model with additional concepts required by particular use cases. The goal of this paper is to provide an overview of the ADE mechanism and a literature review of developments since its introduction a decade ago. The discovery of publications found that currently there are 44 ADEs supporting a wide range of applications, but also application-agnostic purposes such as harmonisation with national geographic information s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this, both CityGML version 2.0 and 3.0 allow for schema extensions to include additional information, either by using generic city objects and attributes, or by creating an Application Domain Extension (ADE). The use of an ADE seems to be the most commonly used technique for extending CityGML and have been used in many different areas [4,[23][24][25][26]. An ADE is created as a new schema with its own namespace and the relevant CityGML classes are imported.…”
Section: Citygmlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this, both CityGML version 2.0 and 3.0 allow for schema extensions to include additional information, either by using generic city objects and attributes, or by creating an Application Domain Extension (ADE). The use of an ADE seems to be the most commonly used technique for extending CityGML and have been used in many different areas [4,[23][24][25][26]. An ADE is created as a new schema with its own namespace and the relevant CityGML classes are imported.…”
Section: Citygmlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these extensions are essentially 'trial balloons' and are not official standards. They could be developed by anyone using different naming conventions and different geometric and semantic notations [11]. Problems related to data interoperability between IFC and CityGML would still exist.…”
Section: D Cadastre: 3d Digital Management Of Property Interests In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensions. It is possible to extend the CityGML model using Generic city objects or ADEs [11]. Extensions and Generics are not supported in LandInfra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output is a CityGML file with LOD1 building objects. The CityGML file can be downloaded by the user directly, or easily integrated in a more structured framework that imports in more robust database systems such as Postgresql supporting further extensibility that is inherent to the CityGML model (Biljecki et al, 2018). Has mentioned, LOD1 is extracted from cartography, but higher levels can be reached if other sources are used, such as LiDAR data or derived products (digital terrain and surface models).…”
Section: Modeling the Urbanscape: Citygmlmentioning
confidence: 99%