T he circadian clock is a molecular mechanism underlying endogenous, self-sustained oscillations with a period of Ϸ24 h, manifested in diverse physiological and metabolic processes (1-3). The most striking feature of circadian clock is its flexible yet robust response to various environmental conditions. For example, circadian periodicity varies with light intensity (4-6) while remaining robust over a wide range of temperatures (''temperature compensation'') (1, 3, 7-9). This flexible-yetrobust characteristic is evolutionarily conserved in organisms ranging from photosynthetic bacteria to warm-blooded mammals (3, 10-12), and has interested researchers from a broad range of disciplines. However, despite many genetic and molecular studies (13-22), the detailed biochemical mechanism underlying this characteristic remains poorly elucidated (3).The simplest explanation for this flexible-yet-robust property is that the key period-determining reactions are insensitive to temperature but responsive to other environmental conditions. Indeed, Pittendrigh proposed the existence of a temperatureinsensitive component in the clock system in 1954 (7), and in 1968, he and his colleagues demonstrated that both the wave form and the period of circadian oscillations are invariant with temperature (23). However, the idea of a temperatureinsensitive biochemical reaction is counterintuitive, as elementary chemical processes are highly temperature-sensitive. One exception is the cyanobacterial clock, in which temperatureinsensitive enzymatic reactions are observed (24,25). However, the cyanobacterial clock is quite distinct from other clock systems, and this biochemical mechanism has not been demonstrated in other clocks.Recently, a chemical-biological approach was proposed to help elucidate the basic processes underlying circadian clocks (26), and high-throughput screening of a large chemical compound library was performed (27). In this report, to analyze systematically the fundamental processes involved in determining the period length of mammalian clocks, we tested 1,260 pharmacologically active compounds for their effect on period length in mouse and human clock cell lines, and found 10 compounds that most markedly lengthened the period of both clock cell lines affected both the central and peripheral circadian clocks. Most compounds inhibited CKI or CKI␦ activity, suggesting that CKI /␦-dependent phosphorylation is an important period-determining process in the mammalian circadian clock. Surprisingly, the degradation rate of endogenous PER2, which is regulated by CKI -dependent phosphorylation (28) and probably by CKI␦-dependent phosphorylation, was temperatureinsensitive in the living clock cells, and the temperatureinsensitivity was preserved even for the in vitro CKI /␦-dependent phosphorylation of a synthetic peptide derived from PER2. These results suggest that this period-determining process is flexible in response to chemical perturbation yet robust in the face of temperature perturbations. Based on these findings, we prop...