2009 International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1109/kse.2009.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Cardiac Arrhythmias Using Interval Type-2 TSK Fuzzy System

Abstract: The paper proposes a method to construct type-2 Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy system for electrocardiogram (ECG) arrhythmic classification. The classifier is applied to distinguish normal sinus rhythm (NSR), ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Two features of ECG signals, the average period and the pulse width, are inputs to the fuzzy classifier. The rule base in the fuzzy system is constructed from training data. We also present the method using fuzzy C-mean clustering algorithm a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In [15], using digital Taylor-Fourier transform (DTFT) features and a least square support vector machine (LS-SVM) with linear and radial basis function (RBF), kernels obtained performance values of Acc = 83.75%. [5] 91.84 90.20 91.00 MIT-BIH using EMD & App Entropy [6] 90.47 91.66 91.20 MIT-BIH using KNN [7] 98.10 88.00 93.20 MIT-BIH using RBF [7] 91.53 90.91 91.30 MIT-BIH using Fuzzy [8] 90.90 MIT-BIH using TSK Fuzzy [9] 93.30 MIT-BIH using Mamdani Fuzzy [9] 86.60 MIT-BIH using Random Forest Classifier [12] 95.04 94.78 94.79 CU & MIT-BIH using SVM [13] 95.00 99.00 CU & MIT-BIH using Binary Decision Tree [14] 95 In paper [20], using boosted classification and regression tree (Boosted-CART) on six features for a binary VFVT and non-VFVT classification, a classification of Acc = 98.29% was obtained. To test the method proposed by the authors, three databases were used (Creighton University Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Database-CUDB, the MIT-BIH Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia Database-VFDB and the MITBIH arrhythmia database-MITDB) totaling 1888 VT/VF samples and 27,992 non-VT/VF samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [15], using digital Taylor-Fourier transform (DTFT) features and a least square support vector machine (LS-SVM) with linear and radial basis function (RBF), kernels obtained performance values of Acc = 83.75%. [5] 91.84 90.20 91.00 MIT-BIH using EMD & App Entropy [6] 90.47 91.66 91.20 MIT-BIH using KNN [7] 98.10 88.00 93.20 MIT-BIH using RBF [7] 91.53 90.91 91.30 MIT-BIH using Fuzzy [8] 90.90 MIT-BIH using TSK Fuzzy [9] 93.30 MIT-BIH using Mamdani Fuzzy [9] 86.60 MIT-BIH using Random Forest Classifier [12] 95.04 94.78 94.79 CU & MIT-BIH using SVM [13] 95.00 99.00 CU & MIT-BIH using Binary Decision Tree [14] 95 In paper [20], using boosted classification and regression tree (Boosted-CART) on six features for a binary VFVT and non-VFVT classification, a classification of Acc = 98.29% was obtained. To test the method proposed by the authors, three databases were used (Creighton University Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Database-CUDB, the MIT-BIH Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia Database-VFDB and the MITBIH arrhythmia database-MITDB) totaling 1888 VT/VF samples and 27,992 non-VT/VF samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of medical data or in the processing of biomedical signals is a field that has exploded in terms of the literature and a number of practical implementations in recent years. From monitoring bracelets to deep learning neural networks, from software systems to hardware implementations, from simple classification algorithms like KNN to deep learning neural networks, only the researchers' imagination is the limit that can cause problems regarding the applicability of AI in the processing of medical data and their applicability with the aim of increasing life expectancy and patient compliance [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharma and Sunkaria [46] employed random forest algorithm (RFAM) for the categorization of Vfib Vta from non-Vfib Vta and obtained ACCY% of 95.66. Phong and Thien [47] succeeded in obtaining ACCY% of 91.3 by employing RFAM while categorizing Vfib. For computerized external defibrillation and patient monitoring, accurate detection and classification of Vfib, Vfl, and Vta is critical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tan also described the results of using a SOM neural network with poor VT accuracy. Later, Phong et al [43] followed the same line implementing another multiclass classifier using a type-2 TSK fuzzy system, with the same three classes than Tan used; in this case, with better accuracy ratios (Acc(VF) = 93.3%, Acc(VT) = 92.0%, Acc(N) = 100%). They also tried a a type-2 Mandami fuzzy system with lower values.…”
Section: Algorithm An Nc_kn N_an Nc(%) An Nc_kn N_l2rlr(%) An Nc_kn Nmentioning
confidence: 99%