2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of martensite-austenite constituents according to its internal morphology in high-strength low alloy steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the microstructure feature of blocky and island FCC, as shown in Figure 4 a, coinciding with the fractography shown in Figure 6 , were undetected after the EPT, suggesting this blocky and island MA feature was responsible for the lower toughness of the as-welded HAZ. This result was in agreement with some other studies [ 20 , 21 ] in which thin-film austenite was reported, but was contrary to another study [ 8 ] in which blocky austenite surrounded by martensite was found to be more effective in hindering crack propagation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, the microstructure feature of blocky and island FCC, as shown in Figure 4 a, coinciding with the fractography shown in Figure 6 , were undetected after the EPT, suggesting this blocky and island MA feature was responsible for the lower toughness of the as-welded HAZ. This result was in agreement with some other studies [ 20 , 21 ] in which thin-film austenite was reported, but was contrary to another study [ 8 ] in which blocky austenite surrounded by martensite was found to be more effective in hindering crack propagation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The impact toughness mainly depends on the crack’s steady propagation energy. Based on Griffith’s crack propagation criterion that was developed by Orowan [ 42 ], as the grain or the second phase at the cleavage initiation could induce the micro-crack unsteady propagation, the cleavage fracture stress and the critical event size, , of the grain or the second phase at the crack initiation, must meet Equation (1). In other words, the critical stress, , of local cleavage fracture is inversely proportional to the square root of the structural parameters (such as inclusions, the second phase, and grain diameter) that induce the cleavage fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the YS and UTS of R2 are close to that of R3, its elongation is considerably lower than that of R3 probably due to the presence of massive M/A constituents in R2. Extensive studies have demonstrated that massive M/A constituents in steel are prone to trigger crack initiation due to local stress concentration between M/A and matrix and are detrimental to ductility and toughness [62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. However, M/A constituents are not always harmful and sometimes they could be favorable for mechanical properties, if they are fine in size and are homogeneously distributed [69][70][71].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the M/A constituents could generate local stress concentration under applied stress due to deformation incompatibility with the matrix [71,82]. Many literature works have demonstrated that massive M/A constituents were prone to trigger crack initiation because of local stress concentration [63][64][65][66][67][68]. Meanwhile, the massive M/A constituents could result in micro-galvanic corrosion between M/A constituents and matrix due to Volta potential variation [34,87].…”
Section: Scc Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation