2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-017-0279-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and biometrical 12-month follow-up in patients after reconstruction of the sural nerve biopsy defect by the collagen-based nerve guide Neuromaix

Abstract: Many new strategies for the reconstruction of peripheral nerve injuries have been explored for their effectiveness in supporting nerve regeneration. However only a few of these materials were actually clinically evaluated and approved for human use. This open, mono-center, non-randomized clinical study summarizes the 12-month follow-up of patients receiving reconstruction of the sural nerve biopsy defect by the collagen-based nerve guide Neuromaix. Neuromaix was implanted as a micro-structured, two-component s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve that, collagen is extremely dynamic, undergoing constant modifications to deliver proper physiologic functions [131]. longitudinal guidance channels is capable of providing mechanical support to sprouting DRGs axons and can offer a shielding niche for nerve cells [178].…”
Section: Collagenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve that, collagen is extremely dynamic, undergoing constant modifications to deliver proper physiologic functions [131]. longitudinal guidance channels is capable of providing mechanical support to sprouting DRGs axons and can offer a shielding niche for nerve cells [178].…”
Section: Collagenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also true, however, that whenever clinical outcome after nerve reconstruction with the approved nerve guides has been analyzed in a prospective, randomized, and controlled way, the results have been variable from very good to poor and therefore certainly less convincing than in preclinical evaluation (Boeckstyns et al 2013;Lohmeyer et al 2014;Kaplan et al 2015;Means et al 2016;Neubrech et al 2018). But again, until today no better preclinical models exist, and the author of this chapter is also aware of only one attempt in which a novel nerve graft development was comprehensively analyzed in the rat sciatic nerve model followed by a first-inhuman study with repair of sural nerves after biopsy procedures (Bozkurt et al 2017;van Neerven et al 2017).…”
Section: The Obstacles In Making Preclinical In Vivo Studies Strong Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 22 In other studies, collagen has also been successfully used as a scaffold in nerve and bladder engineering. 24 26 Additionally, a suture-free, 3D-collagen matrix graft – DuraGen ® (Integra LifeSciences) – has been developed for spinal dural repair and regeneration and is currently approved by the FDA. 27 …”
Section: Natural Biodegradable Polymeric Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%