Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Platelet Rich Fibrin Effect in One-Stage Dental Implant

Ismail, Radwa; Shoreibah, Eatemad; Attia, Mai S.

doi:10.21608/adjg.2019.28397

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The (9,10) .Several researches have been recognized dealing with standard platelet rich fibrin (S-PRF) to enhance osseointegration around dental implant beds and were defined as study groups for the basis of comparison (12,13,14) and a positive control group in another (15) whom considered the dental implant with S-PRF as a positive control group and a study group using diode laser to evaluate the biostimulatory effect of Low Level laser treatment on dental implants in bilaterally missing mandibular posterior teeth.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Concerning all surgical procedures, all selected patients underwent meticulous surgery and applying a delayed implant placement protocol. Ismail et al (14) assessed radiographically the effect of S- Angelo et al (17) who recommended the use of PRF around dental implant in an augmented maxillary bone for enhancing bone regeneration to improve its biomechanical quality with less human morbidity when compared with traditional methods. Boora et al (12) recommended the strong clinical stimulation of bone formation when using S-PRF around dental implant in maxillary anterior region.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of Bone Density around Dental Implants Using Two Platelet-Rich Fibrin Protocols (A Comparative Clinical Study)

Kamal¹,

Salim²

2022

RDENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims:The current study aimed to compare bone density means around dental implants covered with one of two platelet rich fibrin preparation protocols (Standard-Platelet Rich Fibrin and Advanced-Platelet Rich Fibrin) using standard intraoral digital periapical radiographs. Materials and methods: A total of ten male patients with an age range of 28-51 years participated in this split-mouth clinical study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the platelet rich fibrin (PRF) protocol to be used with dental implant insertion into positive control (S-PRF) and study group (A-PRF). Each patient represented the two groups in which he received 2 dental implants; ten implants for each group (a total of 20 dental implants) of standard length and diameter in the posterior mandibular extraction sites of ipsilateral or contralateral side. In the positive control group, the standard PRF protocol was to be used to prepare the PRF clot. In the study group, the advanced PRF protocol was to be used to prepare the PRF clot. Both PRF membranes were to be instilled inside the osteotomy bed during dental fixture installation. Following the installation of dental implants and as a basis for comparison between both groups, densitometric analysis of bone around dental implants at immediate, four, eight and twelve weeks scheduled visits were made. Results: Total densitometric analysis results showed no significant difference within S-PRF group, within A-PRF group and between both groups, with the highest mean (167.07) being at twelve weeks after surgery in the A-PRF group. Conclusions: Both S-PRF and A-PRF, similarly enhanced and maintained bone density (synergistic effect) throughout the of study and as disclosed by densitometric values. The use of PRF in its current forms seems to be an accepted minimally invasive approach with good clinical results.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Concerning all surgical procedures, all selected patients underwent meticulous surgery and applying a delayed implant placement protocol. Ismail et al (14) assessed radiographically the effect of S- Angelo et al (17) who recommended the use of PRF around dental implant in an augmented maxillary bone for enhancing bone regeneration to improve its biomechanical quality with less human morbidity when compared with traditional methods. Boora et al (12) recommended the strong clinical stimulation of bone formation when using S-PRF around dental implant in maxillary anterior region.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Bone Density around Dental Implants Using Two Platelet-Rich Fibrin Protocols (A Comparative Clinical Study)

Kamal¹,

Salim²

2022

RDENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is frequently used to accelerate wound healing. The activated platelets in the PRF clot secret growth factors, which in turn enhance cellular proliferation, collagen synthesis, and osteoid production (9,10) .Several researches have been recognized dealing with standard platelet rich fibrin (S-PRF) to enhance osseointegration around dental implant beds and were defined as study groups for the basis of comparison (12,13,14) and a positive control group in another (15) whom considered the dental implant with S-PRF as a positive control group and a study group using diode laser to evaluate the biostimulatory effect of Low Level laser treatment on dental implants in bilaterally missing mandibular posterior teeth. Advanced platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF), a new concept in PRF has also become a topic of interest (16) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Concerning all surgical procedures, all selected patients underwent meticulous surgery and applying a delayed implant placement protocol. Ismail et al (14) assessed radiographically the effect of S-PRF on dental implant stability compared at day one surgery and 6 months post-surgery, the study revealed a significant difference between bone density values around the dental implant without PRF and with PRF plus the increase in bone density values after six months postsurgery. Sleem et al (15) measured the relative per-implant bone density with S-PRF using intraoral digital radiographs at 4-time intervals (day one surgery and 1, 4 and 9 months postsurgery) and analyzed the radiographic images using DR software by drawing three lines (mesial, distal and apical) around the dental implant and revealed that the relative bone density values gradually increased at first month and forth month after surgery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Dental Implant Stability Using Two Platelet-Rich Fibrin Proto-cols (A Comparative Clinical Study)

Kamal¹,

Hamed²

2021

RDENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims:The current study aimed to compare implant stability of dental implants covered with one of twoplatelet rich fibrin preparation protocols namely Standard-Platelet Rich Fibrin and Advanced-Platelet Rich Fibrin) using radiofrequency assessment. Materials and methods: A total of ten male patients with an age range of 28-51 years participated in this split-mouth clinical study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the platelet rich fibrin (PRF) protocol to be used with dental implant insertion into positive control (S-PRF) and study group (A-PRF). Each patient represented the two groups in which he received 2 dental implants; ten implants for each group (a total of 20 dental implants) of standard length and diameter in the posterior mandibular extraction sites of ipsilateral or contralateral side. In the positive control group, the standard PRF protocol was to be used to prepare the PRF clot. In the study group, the advanced PRF protocol was to be used to prepare the PRF clot. Both PRF membranes were to be instilled inside the osteotomy bed during dental fixture installation. Following the installation of dental implants; radiofrequency assessment using Osstell Mentor Device immediately after insertion, four, eight; twelve weeks post-operative as secondary outcomes were conducted. Results: When comparing ISQ means of dental implants between both group protocols, the Friedman test values of ISQ means showed no statistically significant difference between them at the immediate day of surgery, four weeks, eight weeks and twelve weeks post-surgery yet showed increased levels of ISQ at end of the trial. Conclusions: Both S-PRF and A-PRF, similarly enhanced and maintained dental implant stability hence maintain osseointegration (synergistic effect) throughout the period of study and as disclosed by ISQ values. The use of PRF in its current forms seems to be an accepted minimally invasive approach with good clinical results.

show abstract

Immediate dental implant placement with and without Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in esthetic zone: A comparative study

Iram,

Ajaz,

Hussain

et al. 2024

National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: Biomaterials such as platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have shown to improve healing and osseointegration. Aims: The aim of this study was to clinically and radiographically evaluate and compare immediate implants placed with and without PRF. Settings and Design: This prospective and comparative study was conducted among 30 patients in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Govt. Dental College and Hospital, Srinagar. Materials and Methods: Thirty subjects were randomly divided into two groups: group A or PRF group and group B or non-PRF group with fifteen patients in each group. Clinical parameters such as implant mobility and bleeding on probing were recorded. The radiographic parameters such as bone density in Hounsfield units (HU) and marginal bone loss (mm) were measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Statistical Analysis Used: For intergroup analysis of data, Student’s independent t-test and Chi-square test were employed. The paired t-test and McNemar test were applied for intragroup analysis of data. Results: No significant difference in the mean marginal bone level scores between PRF group and non-PRF group (intergroup) at baseline and at 3 months was observed. A Statistically significant difference was observed in the mean bone density (HU) in the PRF group (intragroup) between baseline and 3 months and also in bleeding on probing between baseline and 6 months in the PRF group (intragroup). Conclusions: The results highlighted the promising but transitory effects of (PRF) membrane in immediate implants and showed an improvement in peri-implant bone density, which improves implant stability and subsequent long implant survival and prognosis.

show abstract

Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Platelet Rich Fibrin Effect in One-Stage Dental Implant

Cited by 3 publications

References 11 publications

Assessment of Bone Density around Dental Implants Using Two Platelet-Rich Fibrin Protocols (A Comparative Clinical Study)

Assessment of Bone Density around Dental Implants Using Two Platelet-Rich Fibrin Protocols (A Comparative Clinical Study)

Assessment of Dental Implant Stability Using Two Platelet-Rich Fibrin Proto-cols (A Comparative Clinical Study)

Immediate dental implant placement with and without Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in esthetic zone: A comparative study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About