2017
DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2017.1322904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical applications of quantitative proteomics using targeted and untargeted data-independent acquisition techniques

Abstract: Introduction While selected/multiple-reaction monitoring (SRM or MRM) is considered the gold standard for quantitative protein measurement, emerging data-independent acquisition (DIA) using high-resolution scans have opened a new dimension of high-throughput, comprehensive quantitative proteomics. These newer methodologies are particularly well suited for discovery of biomarker candidates from human disease samples, and for investigating and understanding human disease pathways. Areas covered This article re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
105
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common example is that untargeted assays which may observe thousands of peptide ions per experiment invariably have a lower limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) compared to assays where a smaller number of ions are targeted. [21][22][23] Improvements in each subsequent generation of hardware can mitigate this compromise, but the improvement is limited. Today, the only way to truly offset this rule is to increase the total LCMS run time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common example is that untargeted assays which may observe thousands of peptide ions per experiment invariably have a lower limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) compared to assays where a smaller number of ions are targeted. [21][22][23] Improvements in each subsequent generation of hardware can mitigate this compromise, but the improvement is limited. Today, the only way to truly offset this rule is to increase the total LCMS run time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass spectrometry (MS)‐based proteomics has dramatically improved and emerged as a prominent tool in the field of biomarker study. The development of isobaric tagging and targeted quantitative proteomic techniques makes the discovery of novel biomarkers feasible . Many protein biomarkers of IBD have been described and are categorized as primarily blood and fecal biomarkers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of isobaric tagging and targeted quantitative proteomic techniques makes the discovery of novel biomarkers feasible. [9][10][11][12] Many protein biomarkers of IBD have been described and are categorized as primarily blood and fecal biomarkers. [13][14][15] Urine is an attractive resource for biomarker research that has been underutilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical proteomics mostly relies on the absolute quantification of targeted proteins or on global proteome quantification (Doherty and Whitfield, 2011;Meyer and Schilling, 2017). Although highly successful, this type of analysis does not reveal the synthesis and clearance rates behind the observed abundance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%