BackgroundThe Japanese Channel (J‐Channel) score was introduced to aid in retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTOs). The predictive value of the J‐Channel score has not been compared with established collateral grading systems such as the Rentrop classification and Werner grade.AimsTo investigate the predictive value of the J‐Channel score, Rentrop classification and Werner grade for successful collateral channel (CC) guidewire crossing and technical CTO PCI success.MethodsA total of 600 prospectively recruited patients underwent CTO PCI. All grading systems were assessed under dual catheter injection. CC guidewire crossing was considered successful if the guidewire reached the distal segment of the CTO vessel through a retrograde approach. Technical CTO PCI success was defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 and residual stenosis <30%.ResultsOf 600 patients, 257 (43%) underwent CTO PCI through a retrograde approach. Successful CC guidewire crossing was achieved in 208 (81%) patients. The predictive value of the J‐Channel score for CC guidewire crossing (area under curve 0.743) was comparable with the Rentrop classification (0.699, p = 0.094) and superior to the Werner grade (0.663, p = 0.002). Technical CTO PCI success was reported in 232 (90%) patients. The Rentrop classification exhibited a numerically higher discriminatory ability (0.676) compared to the J‐Channel score (0.664) and Werner grade (0.589).ConclusionsThe J‐channel score might aid in strategic collateral channel selection during retrograde CTO PCI. However, the J‐Channel score, Rentrop classification, and Werner grade have limited value in predicting technical CTO PCI success.