2010
DOI: 10.1598/rt.63.5.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing the Gap Early: Implementing a Literacy Intervention for At‐Risk Kindergartners in Urban Schools

Abstract: A history of poverty and low academic achievement in four urban schools pointed to the need to implement an early intervention focused on oral language and emergent literacy. The Kindergarten Early Literacy Tutoring (KELT) Program was designed to target senior (5 year old) kindergarten students most at‐risk. The intervention consisted of an extra half‐day of instruction 5 days a week in addition to the Ministry‐mandated half‐day kindergarten program. The evaluation of the KELT program compared the achievement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because younger ELLs receive these opportunities and other sociolinguistic support at an earlier juncture in their lives than older ELLs (in some cases up to 12 months earlier; Deming & Dynarski, 2008), younger ELLs may be able to capitalize on the earlier start and show greater growth. This hypothesis is consistent with a body of research showing that reading interventions that are provided early on in ELLs' lives can set them on developmentally appropriate trajectories with respect to literacy (Ashdown & Simic, 2000;Chall, 2000;MacDonald & Figueredo, 2010) and social outcomes (Haager & Windmueller, 2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Because younger ELLs receive these opportunities and other sociolinguistic support at an earlier juncture in their lives than older ELLs (in some cases up to 12 months earlier; Deming & Dynarski, 2008), younger ELLs may be able to capitalize on the earlier start and show greater growth. This hypothesis is consistent with a body of research showing that reading interventions that are provided early on in ELLs' lives can set them on developmentally appropriate trajectories with respect to literacy (Ashdown & Simic, 2000;Chall, 2000;MacDonald & Figueredo, 2010) and social outcomes (Haager & Windmueller, 2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Young children use their oral language skills to learn to read, while older children use their reading ability to further their language learning -they read to learn" [7]. It can be stated that the role of spoken language in the process of learning to read is prominent, and oral language skills and literacy processes are mutually dependent [1] [2]. The mastery of spoken language enables children to take the next developmental step: learning to read.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although immense strides have been made in recent years in the field of education to understand the process of learning to read, there still remains a question as to what is the most effective and efficient instruction that equips each child with this crucial skill, and what can be done to facilitate and support the process of mastering the skill of reading. One of the avenues that has been extensively explored is the relationship between oral language and reading, and it has been demonstrated that not only is oral language a key element in the acquisition of the skill of reading, but also developing oral language skills has a positive influence on later literacy performance [1] [2] [3] [4]. Therefore, exploring the associations that exist between children's spoken language competence and their reading acquisition is pivotal as such an analysis can set the patterns for an effective way of approaching the phenomenon of reading [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volgens navorsing moet kinders so vroeg moontlik blootgestel word aan leesintervensies (Montgomery & Moore-Brown 2003;MacDonald & Figueredo 2010). Indien kinders nie op 'n vroeë ouderdom aan leesintervensies blootgestel word nie kan hulle leesvaardighede verder agteruitgaan.…”
Section: Inleidingunclassified