2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-digestion of press water and food waste in a biowaste digester for improvement of biogas production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Few researches proved that co-substrates addition can improve methane yields by completing the lack of nutrients in the main substrate, adding the buffering capacity as well as improving microbial community to become better adapted to degrade the organic substances (Abouelenien et al, 2014;Nayono et al, 2010;Lehtomaki et al, 2007). Study by Nayono et al (2010) shows that co-digesting press water from municipal composting plant and food waste with bio-waste suspension from treatment plants had improved the methane yield at the maximum of 17.65% and 23.53%, respectively.…”
Section: Methane Productivitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Few researches proved that co-substrates addition can improve methane yields by completing the lack of nutrients in the main substrate, adding the buffering capacity as well as improving microbial community to become better adapted to degrade the organic substances (Abouelenien et al, 2014;Nayono et al, 2010;Lehtomaki et al, 2007). Study by Nayono et al (2010) shows that co-digesting press water from municipal composting plant and food waste with bio-waste suspension from treatment plants had improved the methane yield at the maximum of 17.65% and 23.53%, respectively.…”
Section: Methane Productivitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While mesophilic temperature is more stable and require less energy for the anaerobic decomposition operation. In addition, mesophilic bacteria may tolerate with drastic changes in surrounding including the temperature [6]. All parameters are in g L-1 except for pH and heavy metals *-=No test conducted *ud=Undetected…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El monitoreo de la DQO en los experimentos es importante porque es un indicador de cuánta materia orgánica se está degradando para ser convertida en biogás (Nayono et al 2010) y se midió con el propósito de observar el efecto de la relación S:I en la producción final de dicho biogás. La figura 3 muestra la evolución de la DQO en los experimentos realizados, es importante señalar la similitud en la forma de las gráficas entre los reactores R1s y R2s con sus respectivos reactores testigo, R1b y R2b, que indican procesos de adaptación y funcionamiento similares a volúmenes idénticos de inóculo utilizado.…”
Section: Demanda Química De Oxígeno (Dqo)unclassified