2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-medication and potential drug interactions among patients with epilepsy

Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the extent of co-medication and to assess potential interactions between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and other drugs among patients with epilepsy. Methods: We studied 663 consecutive patients with epilepsy seen in tertiary outpatient clinic. Data on epilepsy and current treatment with AED(s) were collected from structured interview and medical records. Other medications used regularly were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Possible dru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A sample item was “during the clinic visit, how would you rate your overall quality of care from the physician?” on a 5-point Likert scale of “excellent,” “very good,” “good,” “fair,” and “poor.” Cooperation with clinical pharmacists was measured using five items from Weingarten, Issa, and Posluszny [38]. A sample item was “I’m willing to cooperate with the physician.” Risk of DDI was measured using four items from Bosak et al [39]. A sample item was “interactions between given medications might be life-threatening.” Time availability was measured using five items from Gendelman et al [40] and Pozsgai et al [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample item was “during the clinic visit, how would you rate your overall quality of care from the physician?” on a 5-point Likert scale of “excellent,” “very good,” “good,” “fair,” and “poor.” Cooperation with clinical pharmacists was measured using five items from Weingarten, Issa, and Posluszny [38]. A sample item was “I’m willing to cooperate with the physician.” Risk of DDI was measured using four items from Bosak et al [39]. A sample item was “interactions between given medications might be life-threatening.” Time availability was measured using five items from Gendelman et al [40] and Pozsgai et al [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower estimate of chronic medication use apart from antiseizure medications (40%) was reported in a survey at a tertiary outpatient clinic in Poland. 34 This can be partially explained by the difference in definition of chronic medication (medication that was used on a daily or weekly basis versus medication for which at least two prescriptions were dispensed in one calendar year), and the study method (questionnaires versus insurers' dispensing information). Questionnaires are more prone to bias, whereas insurance data is complete and objective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If both exams are normal, the risk of recurrence of seizures is less than 30%, being higher in the first months after the initial crisis, decreasing progressively. When both exams are abnormal, the risk of recurrence reaches 80% (Bosak et al, 2019).…”
Section: Isolated Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%