2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xl-3-w4-11-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-Registration of Terrestrial and Uav-Based Images – Experimental Results

Abstract: ABSTRACT:For many applications within urban environments the combined use of images taken from the ground and from unmanned aerial platforms seems interesting: while from the airborne perspective the upper parts of objects including roofs can be observed, the ground images can complement the data from lateral views to retrieve a complete visualisation or 3D reconstruction of interesting areas. The automatic co-registration of air-and ground-based images is still a challenge and cannot be considered solved. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the results of those approaches were reported by Gerke et al. (2016) and B. Wu et al. (2018).…”
Section: Dataset and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the results of those approaches were reported by Gerke et al. (2016) and B. Wu et al. (2018).…”
Section: Dataset and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In this part, the results of the proposed framework are compared with the results reported by Gerke et al. (2016) and B. Wu et al. (2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…SURF and KAZE obtained subpixel registration accuracies but SURF was observed to be faster. KAZE employs the additive operator splitting, which has been reported to be quite inefficient (Gerke, Nex, & Jende, 2016). On the other hand, KAZE is more rigorous in feature detection than SURF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Registration methods based on automated 2D-2D or 3D-3D correspondence extraction: they focus on the development / improvement of new tie point or 3D feature matching extraction approaches (Tombari and Remondino, 2013;Gerke et al 2016;Koch et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2018);…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%