2016
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201500465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 Capture Performance of Calcium‐Based Sorbents in the Presence of SO2 under Pressurized Carbonation

Abstract: In order to understand the effect of SO 2 on the CO 2 capture performance under pressurized carbonation conditions, tests by orthogonal design were carried out in a calcination/pressurized carbonation reactor system. The effects of variables such as carbonation temperature, carbonation pressure, SO 2 concentration, CO 2 concentration, and the number of cycles on carbonation and sulfation were investigated. A range method was employed for analysis. Phase structure and scanning electron microscopy images were me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure illustrates the effects of the carbonation pressure, carbonation temperature, and particle size on the heat storage capacity of the CaO pellets based on the orthogonal experiments under harsh calcination conditions. A higher R i means that the effect of the factor i is stronger . The average carbonation conversion and average heat storage density of the sample for each level are calculated by eqs and , respectively, as follows: where X ave is the average carbonation conversion of the sample for each level during N TCHS cycles and E g,ave is the average heat storage density of the sample for each level during N TCHS cycles (kJ/kg).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure illustrates the effects of the carbonation pressure, carbonation temperature, and particle size on the heat storage capacity of the CaO pellets based on the orthogonal experiments under harsh calcination conditions. A higher R i means that the effect of the factor i is stronger . The average carbonation conversion and average heat storage density of the sample for each level are calculated by eqs and , respectively, as follows: where X ave is the average carbonation conversion of the sample for each level during N TCHS cycles and E g,ave is the average heat storage density of the sample for each level during N TCHS cycles (kJ/kg).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher R i means that the effect of the factor i is stronger. 47 The average carbonation conversion and average heat storage density of the sample for each level are calculated by eqs 6 and 7, respectively, as follows:…”
Section: Effect Of Carbonation Conditions On Heat Storage Performance...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the drop of CO 2 capture capacity of the CaO‐based sorbents and the attrition of the particles , during the CaL process are the two primary issues that should be considered. It is well‐accepted that thermal sintering at high temperatures will spoil the CO 2 capture capacity of the sorbents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the CO 2 ‐capture performance depends on the solid sorbent surface area, pore structure, chemical composition (impurities or additives), calcination temperature, calcination and carbonation duration time, reactor type, and CO 2 concentration during the calcination process , . The CO 2 capture capacity of the CaO sorbent decreased with the cycles of operation , . Therefore, a better regeneration or desorption method was investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%