2017
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201600622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 Footprint and Life‐Cycle Costs of Electrochemical Energy Storage for Stationary Grid Applications

Abstract: Batteries are considered as one of the key flexibility options for future energy storage systems. However, their production is cost‐ and greenhouse‐gas intensive and efforts are made to decrease their price and carbon footprint. We combine life‐cycle assessment, Monte‐Carlo simulation, and size optimization to determine life‐cycle costs and carbon emissions of different battery technologies in stationary applications, which are then compared by calculating a single score. Cycle life is determined as a key fact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
116
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
116
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,2] However,t he choice of electrochemical reactions is rather limited, because flowing redoxm aterials do not maintain continuous contact with the current collector. [1,2] However,t he choice of electrochemical reactions is rather limited, because flowing redoxm aterials do not maintain continuous contact with the current collector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] However,t he choice of electrochemical reactions is rather limited, because flowing redoxm aterials do not maintain continuous contact with the current collector. [1,2] However,t he choice of electrochemical reactions is rather limited, because flowing redoxm aterials do not maintain continuous contact with the current collector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the battery sector is a confidentiality‐sensitive industry, which makes it difficult to determine meaningful projections. To take into account the evolution of the technologies, a simplification was used and a 10% improvement every 20 years was applied to the cycle life, as documented in work by Baumann and colleagues (). The other parameters were assumed to remain stable, as no projections are available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lithium‐ion batteries have been rapidly developing due to high voltage platform, high energy density, good circulation performance, low self‐discharge rate and no memory effect And batteries are considered one of the key options for future energy storage systems . But the safety, service life and cost of lithium‐ion batteries are the main factors that hinder the popularity in Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs) applications …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%