2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2-mitigation options for the offshore oil and gas sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their so-called thermo-environomic design explores trade-offs not only in environmental (eco-indicators) and economic objectives (profit) but also in thermodynamic objectives (thermodynamic efficiency). They found that neither objective alone is sufficient for a balanced process design by applying their framework to CO 2 mitigation in chemical processes and oil and gas plants (105)(106)(107). Pavão et al (108) also chose a derivative-free optimization approach, using a meta-heuristic approach with simulated annealing and particle swarm optimization, to synthesize a heat-exchanger network with minimum cost and environmental impacts.…”
Section: Process Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their so-called thermo-environomic design explores trade-offs not only in environmental (eco-indicators) and economic objectives (profit) but also in thermodynamic objectives (thermodynamic efficiency). They found that neither objective alone is sufficient for a balanced process design by applying their framework to CO 2 mitigation in chemical processes and oil and gas plants (105)(106)(107). Pavão et al (108) also chose a derivative-free optimization approach, using a meta-heuristic approach with simulated annealing and particle swarm optimization, to synthesize a heat-exchanger network with minimum cost and environmental impacts.…”
Section: Process Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the ORC and the boiler constitute a heat recovery system of hierarchy, and the higher temperature (from 400 • C to 500 • C) and the lower temperature (from 160 • C to 220 • C) heat can be recovered simultaneously. Moreover, a two-level CO 2 capture unit proposed in [1] for an oil platform is used to mitigate the emissions. The first level is a Pre-CO 2 capture unit with the structure presented in [30], where natural gas is converted into hydrogen.…”
Section: Iess For Offshore Oil Extraction and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serious environmental challenges and a plummeting international oil price facing the market, have put the offshore oil industry in a dilemma: how to mitigate the CO 2 emissions from offshore oil projects without increasing the capital expenditure significantly [1]. In Norway, about 62% of the carbon dioxide emissions in 2012 came from offshore oil extraction and processing tasks [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the Norwegian continental shelf only three such projects were developed [15], as concerns regarding the additional weight, the complexity of the power cycle, and the cost prevailed. A number of other options were more recently proposed and investigated, involving the power plant [16] as well as the processing plant [17]. A way to decarbonize the offshore operation without deeply modifying the power generation system could be to introduce a carbon capture process [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technical and economic analyses of offshore electrification have been presented [25]. The environmental performance of electrification tends to be analysed with a simplistic approach, for instance associating average values of CO 2 emissions to the power sent offshore [17]. However, the power system is a very integrated system that is predicted to change deeply in the upcoming years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%