CO2 Utilization from “Next Generation” CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology

Kuuskraa, V.A.; Godec, Michael; Dipietro, Phil

doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.618

Cited by 117 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 4 shows the amount of CO 2 fermentation emissions resulting from global ethanol production today. The size of international sink capacity for EOR projects is 370 billion metric tonnes of CO 2 (Kuuskraa et al, 2013;Stevens et al, 2001). At current ethanol production rates, this represents over 5000 years of available storage capacity for CO 2 fermentation emissions.…”

Section: Worldwide Ethanol Production and Co 2 Sequestration Potentialmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A CO 2 gathering and transportation system will therefore need to be constructed to the adjoining states that do have hydrocarbon basins suitable for Table 3). Natural source totals are from Kuuskraa et al (2013). CO 2 -EOR (Hill et al, 2013).…”

Section: Pipeline Infrastructure Required To Capture and Store Corn Ementioning

confidence: 99%

“…CO 2 -EOR was responsible for 6% of the oil produced in the United States in 2012 (EIA, 2014). About 20% of the 62 million metric tonnes of CO 2 supplied to EOR operations in 2012 were from industrial sources (Kuuskraa et al, 2013). The source of CO 2 for EOR is otherwise from natural sources of CO 2 recovered from subsurface reservoirs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Carbon negative oil: A pathway for CO2 emission reduction goals

Hornafius

2015

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Worldwide Ethanol Production and Co 2 Sequestration Potentialmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Pipeline Infrastructure Required To Capture and Store Corn Ementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Carbon negative oil: A pathway for CO2 emission reduction goals

Hornafius

2015

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In 2011, IEAGHG conducted a study on the assessment of CO2 storage capacity and concluded that possible storage capacity during EOR-CO2 process is around 370 billion tons (Kuuskraa et al, 2013).…”

Section: Enhanced Oil Recovery (Eor-co2 Method)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Criteria for CO2 storage in geological formations

Tomić¹,

Karović-Maričić²,

Danilović³

et al. 2018

Podzemni radovi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CO2 storage in geological formations represents today one of the main new technological solutions for CO2 emission mitigation. Carbon capture and storage technology (CCS) includes capture of anthropogenic CO2 from various emitters, its transportation and injection in different types of geological formations such as: depleted oil and gas reservoirs, saline formations, unmined coal beds, partially depleted oil reservoirs for enhanced oil recovery (EOR-CO2 method) and others. The analysis of numerous criteria that are determining the success of process implementation from a technical, safety, ecological and economic point of view is necessary for considering the optimal CO2 geological storage option. In this paper, an overview of CO2 geological storage types is presented, with an emphasis on criteria for selection of most adequate CO2 storage option. They include geological, physical, thermodynamic, hydrodynamic, techno economic, social criteria, as well as the regulatory issues that are key factors for CCS technology development and further deployment.

show abstract

“…The presence of infrastructure leads us to the question of effective CO 2 use/utilization. On the one hand, it is a highly promising area to increase oil recovery with CO 2 [27,28]. On the other hand, in the long term, with oil share decreasing in the global energy balance, the primary role could be given over to the production of carbonated goods [29].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential of Russian Regions to Implement CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The paper assesses the techno-economic potential of Russia to implement carbon capture and storage technologies that imply the capture of anthropogenic CO 2 and its injection into geologic reservoirs for long-term storage. The focus is on CO 2 enhanced oil recovery projects that seem to be the most economically promising option of carbon capture and storage. The novelty of the work lies in the formulation of a potential assessment method of CO 2 enhanced oil recovery, which allows for establishing a connection between energy production and oil extraction from the viewpoint of CO 2 supply and demand. Using linear optimization, the most promising combinations of CO 2 sources and sinks are identified and an economic evaluation of these projects is carried out. Based on this information, regions of Russia are ranked according to their prospects in regards to CO 2 capture and enhanced oil recovery storage. The results indicate that Russia has a significant potential to utilize its power plants as CO 2 sources for enhanced oil recovery projects. It has been estimated that 71 coal-fired power plants, and 185 of the gas-fired power plants of Russia annually produce 297.1 and 309.6 Mt of CO 2 that can cover 553.4 Mt of the demand of 322 Russian oil fields. At the same time, the total CO 2 storage capacity of the Russian fields is estimated at 7382.6 Mt, however, due to geological and technical factors, only 22.6% can be used for CO 2 -EOR projects. Of the 183 potential projects identified in the regional analysis phase, 99 were found to be cost-effective, with an average unit cost of € 19.07 per ton of CO 2 and a payback period of 8.71 years. The most promising of the estimated regions is characterized by a well-developed energy industry, relatively low transportation costs, numerous large and medium-sized oil fields at the final stages of development, and favorable geological conditions that minimize the cost of injection. Geographically, they are located in the North-Western, Volga, and Ural Federal districts.

show abstract

CO2 Utilization from “Next Generation” CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology

Cited by 117 publications

References 0 publications

Carbon negative oil: A pathway for CO2 emission reduction goals

Carbon negative oil: A pathway for CO2 emission reduction goals

Criteria for CO2 storage in geological formations

Potential of Russian Regions to Implement CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About