1959
DOI: 10.4095/100520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalfields west half Cumberland county Nova Scotia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the GMA retained control over the four-square-mile tract at Joggins (Brown 1899;Copeland 1959). In 1865, it expanded operations through the development of a drift mine on the Fundy and Dirty seams (Browne 1868).…”
Section: Historical Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the GMA retained control over the four-square-mile tract at Joggins (Brown 1899;Copeland 1959). In 1865, it expanded operations through the development of a drift mine on the Fundy and Dirty seams (Browne 1868).…”
Section: Historical Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study provide strong dating of the timbers as a group, with 71% of the patterns of the samples being accurately dated at a 99% confidence interval. (Hale 1731;Drummond 1918;Goudge 1945;Copeland 1959;Falcon-Lang 2009). Dendrochronological studies presented here illustrate that the timber pit props currently exposed in the sea cliffs were cut between 1857 and 1875, with the exception of one sample dated to 1849.…”
Section: Sample Identification Codementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When Jackson and Alger (1829, p. 149) reconnoitred the Joggins shoreline in 1829 they encountered a "shaft filled in with earth and rubbish" at the level of the Fundy Seam. Furthermore Copeland (1958) mentioned seeing an historic map showing "old French workings" (p. 7) on the Fundy Seam, but gave no details. In view of these observations, it is likely that Acadian workings were visible in the Fundy Seam until the early nineteenth century, but have subsequently been either destroyed by cliff erosion or reworked by later mining activity.…”
Section: Copyright © Atlantic Geology 2009mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He later restricted the definition to include all of Division 6 and 282 feet 6 inches (86.1 m) of largely concealed section at the top of Division 7 (Bell 1943). This definition remained largely unchanged through decades of mapping and scrutiny (Copeland 1959;Belt 1964;Kelley 1967;Howie and Barss 1975 et al (1991) revised the definition of the Boss Point Formation to include the upper and lower redbeds so that it once again coincided with Logan's (1845) Division 6. Although never formally defined, the redbeds and distinctive channel bodies near the top of the formation (above 951.7 m in our section) were identified as the "North Reef member" in their figures and diagrams (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%