Advances in Fisheries Economics 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470751589.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalition Games in Fisheries Economics

Abstract: We review the literature on coalition games applied in fisheries economics.We first indicate the importance and origin of the theory. Then we compare noncooperative and cooperative coalition game approaches. Our conclusion is that the non-cooperative and the cooperative approach should be linked together. To achieve this aim future research on stability of cooperative solutions and factors influencing stability is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Applications of game theory in fisheries can be divided into three broad categories: non-cooperative, cooperative and coalition games (see reviews by Sumaila 1999;Lindroos et al 2007;Bailey et al 2010). Non-cooperative games assume that each player maximizes self interest and can be used to study situations where players compete for the resource.…”
Section: Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of game theory in fisheries can be divided into three broad categories: non-cooperative, cooperative and coalition games (see reviews by Sumaila 1999;Lindroos et al 2007;Bailey et al 2010). Non-cooperative games assume that each player maximizes self interest and can be used to study situations where players compete for the resource.…”
Section: Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cope with this type of problems, game theory provides a toolbox to analyze the interactions; in particular the cooperative game approach has been commonly applied in resource games (see Folmer et al 1998). 16 Over the years, there have been several reviews on the application of game theory from a historical development (see for instance Munro, 1998, 2003;Sumaila, 1999;Lindroos et al, 2007;Bailey et al, 2010). The following section does not intend to repeat or refine these overview papers on the historical development but rather to take the offset in the resource and the development around understanding the characteristics of the resources and to relate to the foresights in Bjørndal and Munro (2003), Sumaila (1999), Lindroos et al (2007) and Bailey et al (2010) to this.…”
Section: International Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there is no guarantee that all or any of these approaches will lead to a stable coalition structure, that is, one that is rational to all players. A review of a coalitional fisheries games was undertaken in Lindroos et al (2007).…”
Section: Coalitions: Characteristic-function Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%