CoastMaster

Steinberger, Fabius; Proppe, Patrick; Schroeter, Ronald; Alt, Florian

doi:10.1145/3003715.3005412

Cited by 18 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several concepts by Schroeter and Steinberger introduced game design aspects to automotive user interfaces [45][46][47]. They use gamification to trigger engaging tasks for distracted drivers, to give them feedback on their driving performance, and to increase situational awareness with proactive markers.…”

Section: Gamificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Improving Driver Emotions with Affective Strategies

Braun

Schubert

Pfleging

et al. 2019

MTI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drivers in negative emotional states, such as anger or sadness, are prone to perform bad at driving, decreasing overall road safety for all road users. Recent advances in affective computing, however, allow for the detection of such states and give us tools to tackle the connected problems within automotive user interfaces. We see potential in building a system which reacts upon possibly dangerous driver states and influences the driver in order to drive more safely. We compare different interaction approaches for an affective automotive interface, namely Ambient Light, Visual Notification, a Voice Assistant, and an Empathic Assistant. Results of a simulator study with 60 participants (30 each with induced sadness/anger) indicate that an emotional voice assistant with the ability to empathize with the user is the most promising approach as it improves negative states best and is rated most positively. Qualitative data also shows that users prefer an empathic assistant but also resent potential paternalism. This leads us to suggest that digital assistants are a valuable platform to improve driver emotions in automotive environments and thereby enable safer driving.

show abstract

Section: Gamificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They use gamification to trigger engaging tasks for distracted drivers, to give them feedback on their driving performance, and to increase situational awareness with proactive markers. The resulting re-engagement and better hedonic qualities of these systems can, however, come accompanied with increased visual distraction [46].…”

Section: Gamificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving Driver Emotions with Affective Strategies

Braun

Schubert

Pfleging

et al. 2019

MTI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Persuasive systems employ techniques or incentives to change drivers' voluntary attitudes or behaviours (Fogg, 2010). The implementation of such persuasive systems in the driving environment can for example help reduce speeding and improve driver engagement during monotonous driving (Steinberger, Proppe, Schroeter, & Alt, 2016). Persuasive systems have also been used to encourage drivers to adopt a more eco-friendly driving style (Ecker, Holzer, Broy, & Butz, 2011), or a safer driving style (Shi, Lee, Kurczak, & Lee, 2012).…”

Section: The Problem and Scopementioning

confidence: 99%

“…We apply the model to the design of our lane-specific advice system, as described in Section 6 of this paper. The developed model can be applied in a broader sense, for example to cooperative driving systems that require drivers to behave in a certain way (Lütteken, Zimmermann, & Bengler, 2016;Risto, 2014), eco-driving systems (Ecker et al, 2011;Magana & Organero, 2011), or systems stimulating safer driving styles (Rodríguez et al, 2014;Steinberger et al, 2016).…”

Section: Context Of the Developed Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

A conceptual model for persuasive in-vehicle technology to influence tactical level driver behaviour

Gent

Farah

Nes

et al. 2019

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviou

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Persuasive in-vehicle systems aim to intuitively influence the attitudes and/or behaviour of a driver (i.e. without forcing them). However, the challenge in using these systems in a driving setting, is to maximise the persuasive effect without infringing upon the driver's safety. This paper proposes a conceptual model for driver persuasion at the tactical level (i.e., driver manoeuvring level, such as lane-changing and car-following). The main focus of the conceptual model is to describe how to safely persuade a driver to change his or her behaviour, and how persuasive systems may affect driver behaviour. First, existing conceptual and theoretical models that describe behaviour are discussed, along with their applicability to the driving task. Next, we investigate the persuasive methods used with a focus on the traffic domain. Based on this we develop a conceptual model that incorporates behavioural theories and persuasive methods, and which describes how effective and safe driver persuasion functions. Finally, we apply the model to a case study of a lane-specific advice system that aims to reduce travel time delay and traffic congestion by advising some drivers to change lanes in order to achieve a better distribution of traffic over the motorway lanes.

show abstract

“…Concerns adding visual cues to multimedia learning materials within the system to help users find elements that are relevant at any given moment fluidly. [14,16,27,31,32] R11.…”

Section: Use Signalling Principlementioning

confidence: 99%

Towards High Usability in Gamified Systems: A Systematic Review of Key Concepts and Approaches

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gamification is widely used in various domains as it helps increase user motivation and engagement. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the gamified system meets usability requirements and conforms to user experience and human-centred design guidelines, as poor usability may lead to undesired side-effects, such as a loss of user retention. Unfortunately, it is not entirely clear what usability guidelines are related to gamified systems and how they depend on the gamification target audience and on the gamified system application domain. This paper provides a systematic review of usability, user experience and human-centred design guidelines for gamified systems. A systematic search was performed in Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and ACM Digital Library databases, following the PRISMA guidelines. The results show that most of the recommendations listed in analysed papers are related to improving learnability of gamified systems. Furthermore, the system application domain is generally viewed as very important when making usability-related decisions. The key distinctive gamification application domains are medicine, education, and business. The findings may be useful to usability and gamification researchers, as well as the developers and owners of gamified systems who want to grasp the state of research into the specifics of gamified systems usability.

show abstract

CoastMaster

Cited by 18 publications

References 13 publications

Improving Driver Emotions with Affective Strategies

Improving Driver Emotions with Affective Strategies

A conceptual model for persuasive in-vehicle technology to influence tactical level driver behaviour

Towards High Usability in Gamified Systems: A Systematic Review of Key Concepts and Approaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About