2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coating optimisation for high speed machining with advanced nanomechanical test methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
66
1
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
66
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Plastic flow can be considered as the major source of stress relaxation in the coating system. Although plasticity is not the same as toughness, as discussed in detail elsewhere [19,21,[26][27][28], nevertheless in practice it appears that the two properties are well correlated. Where high 15 fracture toughness is associated with high H 3 /E 2 then this appears to be a consequence of the higher load-support (the critical load for plastic flow is connected to H 3 /E 2 ) so that for a given load the total deformation is lower so the bending stresses in the coating are reduced rather than intrinsic structural toughening.…”
Section: Nanoindentation and Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Plastic flow can be considered as the major source of stress relaxation in the coating system. Although plasticity is not the same as toughness, as discussed in detail elsewhere [19,21,[26][27][28], nevertheless in practice it appears that the two properties are well correlated. Where high 15 fracture toughness is associated with high H 3 /E 2 then this appears to be a consequence of the higher load-support (the critical load for plastic flow is connected to H 3 /E 2 ) so that for a given load the total deformation is lower so the bending stresses in the coating are reduced rather than intrinsic structural toughening.…”
Section: Nanoindentation and Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…At low relative indentation depth the substrate contribution is minimal and the observed differences in x are due to differences in coating properties. FE analysis has predicted x ~5 [17][18] whilst for bulk materials experimental evidence suggests that x ~ 5 for glasses and x ~6-7 for metals [19][20]. For hard coating systems x has been reported to be ~6.4 on TiN-based nanocomposites [21] and 5.7 on TiAlCrN/TiAlCrSiYN multilayers [22].…”
Section: Nanoindentation and Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. These investigations take advantage of the features in the real time force-displacement (P-h), displacement-time (h-t) or stiffness curves recorded during repeated loading/unloading of bulk materials and thin films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test methodologies and data analysis techniques adapted in previous investigations can be categorised in three main areas. The first one is depth sensing as indicated by Beake et al [5][6][7][8][9] where a sudden increase in contact depth vs. time or number of impacts indicate the failure of component or film. The second one is area based calculations as indicated by Bouzakis et al [10][11] where the fracture ratio of failed area and undamaged film indicates film failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%