2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Ethology and exploring attention in real-world scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
103
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
103
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“….6]. Dovetailing with our analyses of unique breakpoint windows and conceptually replicating past studies that have investigated attentional effects elicited by static social information (e.g., Friesen & Kingstone, 1998;Smilek et al, 2006), these data indicate that dynamic social information also appears to be attended automatically. Moreover, our results also suggest that attention paid to social information consequently aids the formation of social perception units, as eye movements directed to social cues during passive viewing reliably predicted eye movements towards the same social cues during the social segmentation task.…”
Section: Overlapping Social and Nonsocial Breakpointsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“….6]. Dovetailing with our analyses of unique breakpoint windows and conceptually replicating past studies that have investigated attentional effects elicited by static social information (e.g., Friesen & Kingstone, 1998;Smilek et al, 2006), these data indicate that dynamic social information also appears to be attended automatically. Moreover, our results also suggest that attention paid to social information consequently aids the formation of social perception units, as eye movements directed to social cues during passive viewing reliably predicted eye movements towards the same social cues during the social segmentation task.…”
Section: Overlapping Social and Nonsocial Breakpointsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Based on the large literature indicating attentional priority for eyes and faces (e.g., Frischen, Bayliss, & Tipper, 2007;Smilek et al, 2006), one might predict that parsing social events on a more fine-grained scale, as it would be required during a breakpoint window that is marked as both social and nonsocial, would depend on the information conveyed by subtle social cues. If so, during this overlapping breakpoint window, participants should be fixating eyes and faces more while performing a social than a nonsocial segmentation task.…”
Section: Overlapping Social and Nonsocial Breakpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with studies using isolated face stimuli, finding that individuals with autism spend significantly less time fixated on the eyes (Dalton et al, 2005;Pelphrey et al, 2002). However, stimulus characteristics play a central role in fixation patterns, with differences between fixations towards drawings, photographs, isolated faces and movie clips (van der Geest, Kemner, Camfferman, Verbaten, & van Engeland., 2002a;Speer, Cook, McMahon, & Clark, 2007) such that reducing ecological validity impacts upon results (see Smilek, Birmingham, Cameron, Bischof, & Kingstone, 2006 in relation to 'cognitive ethology' when discussing the issue of ecological validity in eye-tracking research). In the current paper the term ecological validity refers to how well the stimuli mirror realistic social information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eye movements | overt visual attention | visual cognition | autism I nterest in understanding how our visual attention is influenced by social stimuli has grown substantially in recent years (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Everyday experience tells us that the social content of a scene, such as the people or faces in it, can "grab" our attention, leading us to focus in on these social stimuli, often at the expense of attending to other features in our environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%