1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00288175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive mechanisms mediating the biasing effects of leader sex on ratings of leader behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical support for this point of view comes from a study conducted by Dobbins et al (1985). In contrast to past research on leadership and gender stereotypes, under controlled conditions Dobbins et al found that female leaders were rated as higher in initiating structure than were males.…”
Section: Study 2 Theoretical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empirical support for this point of view comes from a study conducted by Dobbins et al (1985). In contrast to past research on leadership and gender stereotypes, under controlled conditions Dobbins et al found that female leaders were rated as higher in initiating structure than were males.…”
Section: Study 2 Theoretical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since the characteristics associated with women are similar to the characteristics associated with good organizational citizens, it seems reasonable that raters might anticipate women as being more likely to engage in acts of citizenship behavior than males. Additionally, research has shown that the more ambiguous the job or evaluation context, the more likely it is that stereotypical evaluations will occur (Clayton, Baird, & Levinson, 1984;Dobbins, Stuart, Pence, & Sgro, 1985;Gerdes & Garber, 1983). Since citizenship behavior is not explicitly described or prescribed by the organization, it is significantly more ambiguous in nature than is task-related behavior.…”
Section: Theoretical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that gender bias is less likely to occur under circumstances in which there is unambiguous and undeniable information about performance (Heilman, Martell, & Simon, 1988;Nieva & Gutek, 1980;Pheterson, Kiesler, & Goldberg, 1971). Further, several studies have found that the more ambiguous the job or evaluation criteria, the more likely it is that stereotypical evaluations will occur (Clayton, Baird, & Levinson, 1984;Dobbins, Stuart, Pence, & Sgro, 1985;Gerdes & Garber, 1983).…”
Section: Gender and Ocbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, gender stereotypes provide negative leadership competence expectations for women (Bartol & Butterfield, 1976;Dobbins, Stuart, Pence, & Sgro, 1985). Yet, objectively, the female leader performed well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%