2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-99362010000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colaboração científica: revisão teórico-conceitual

Abstract: A colaboração vem despertando interesse da comunidade científica há alguns anos e muitos estudos foram realizados para conhecer a evolução do fenômeno e sua relação com a ciência e sua comunicação. Apresenta uma revisão dos aspectos teóricos e conceituais da co-autoria e da colaboração científica na literatura nacional e internacional, buscando definir esta prática sob diferentes perspectivas e indicando algumas das motivações que levam à colaboração.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
21

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
31
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Social Network Analysis is used as an important complement to the bibliometric indicators (Vanz and Stumpf 2010), since it enables the understanding of the relationship among players in a graphical representation of the characteristics and dynamics of collaboration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social Network Analysis is used as an important complement to the bibliometric indicators (Vanz and Stumpf 2010), since it enables the understanding of the relationship among players in a graphical representation of the characteristics and dynamics of collaboration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They allow for the evaluation of the scientific development of players, their participation in international scientifi c cooperation and their contributions to science and economic progress. Furthermore, they can be useful to outline national and institutional strategies, for the planning and evaluation of science policies (Vanz and Stumpf 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Internet access contributed to this purpose, enabling scientists from different places to work together. [9] The index H is relevant for it is a standard used to demonstrate the qualitative and quantitative impact of the authors' scientific productions. [10] It is the result of the balance between the numbers of scientific publications and citations; therefore, it is defined by the number of the researcher's published articles with a number of citations equal to or higher than this number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To carry out this study, the following steps were considered: Vanz and Stumpf [10]: survey of the publications and selection of the sample, collection, organization of data, treatment and presentation of results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%