“…A large number of studies have illustrated that water temperature can drive metabolic effects on growth, body mass, swimming capacity, and reproductive success of fish (Coulter, Höök, Mahapatra, Guffey, & Sepúlveda, 2015;Donelson, McCormick, Booth, & Munday, 2014;Elliott & Hurley, 1997;Jonsson, Jonsson, & Finstad, 2013;Pauly, 1980), influence interspecific competition (e.g., Fausch & White, 1981;Wagner, Deweber, Detar, & Sweka, 2013), and alter diet preferences (e.g., Hammock & Johnson, 2014;Hidalgo & Alliot, 1988). Despite the recognized importance of thermal regimes on aquatic organisms and their distributions (e.g., Caissie, 2006;Williams, Isaak, Imhof, Hendrickson, & McMillan, 2015), few studies have investigated how specific recognized thermal microhabitats in pools vary in their thermal value within river systems. Nor have studies investigated how landscape-level or in-channel hydrogeomorphic parameters influence thermal characteristics of these pool habitats and the role that this complexity plays in providing population resiliency to thermal stresses (e.g., Isaak et al, 2009;Torgersen, Rice, & Iram, 1999).…”