Biomaterials 1967
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6555-0_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collagen-Derived Membrane: Corneal Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collagen has previously been used by other groups for uses in the cornea, such as intracorneal lamellar implants, 7 and as contact lens for wound healing and drug delivery. 8 We recently reported the development of a corneal substitute that is made up of a matrix of cross-linked type I collagen that promoted corneal cell and nerve repair over 6 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collagen has previously been used by other groups for uses in the cornea, such as intracorneal lamellar implants, 7 and as contact lens for wound healing and drug delivery. 8 We recently reported the development of a corneal substitute that is made up of a matrix of cross-linked type I collagen that promoted corneal cell and nerve repair over 6 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to early experiments where membranes containing collagen from calfskin showed almost no invasion of keratocytes or any evidence of degradation, migration of keratocytes into the collagenous matrix and a concomitant remodeling of the collagen by the degradation with de novo production of collagen fibers was seen in the biomaterials used in our study after intrastromal placement. 34 Even though the collagen membranes used here were not optical clear from the beginning transparency gradually increased over time after intrastromal implantation presumably due to the remodeling of the hosted collagen fibers, which was seen histologically. However, cross-linked variants showed characteristics similar to those of amniotic membrane with much less signs of degradation after intrastromal implantation.…”
Section: Fig 8 (A)mentioning
confidence: 95%