Abstract:It is known that the center-of-mass energy of the collision of two massive particles following geodesics around a black hole presents a maximum. The maximum energy increases when the black hole is endowed with spin, and for a maximally rotating hole this energy blows up, offering, in principle, a unique probe of fundamental physics. This work extends the latter studies by considering that the colliding particles possess intrinsic angular momentum (spin), described by the Hanson-Regge-Hojman theory of spinning … Show more
“…The CM energy for the extremal KN black hole near the horizon is (25) where the K 4 is defined in appendix A. We can see that when a 2 −j 1 a + 1 = 0 or a 2 −j 2 a + 1 = 0 the CM energy will be divergent and the critical total angular momentumj i = 1+a 2 a (i = 1, 2), which is the same as that of Ref.…”
Section: Extremal Kerr-newman Black Hole Casementioning
confidence: 74%
“…The case with a = Q = 0 describes the Schwarzschild black hole as an accelerator of spinning test particles given in Ref. [25].…”
Section: Spinning Particles In Charged Spinning Black Hole Backgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the velocity vector u µ and the canonical momentum vector P µ of the spinning test particle are not parallel [22,25,[28][29][30], and the canonical momentum P µ satisfies P µ P µ = −m 2 which indicates that the canonical momentum vector keeps timelike along the trajectory. However, the velocity vector u µ of the spinning test particle might transform to be spacelike from timelike [22,25,28].…”
Section: Velocity Of Spinning Test Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the velocity vector u µ of the spinning test particle might transform to be spacelike from timelike [22,25,28]. This can be avoided if one considers the reaction of the spinning test particles to the spacetime, and the results will be more accurate.…”
Section: Velocity Of Spinning Test Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Refs. [22,25,[28][29][30] show that the velocity vector u µ and the canonical momentum vector P µ of the spinning test particle are not parallel, and the velocity vector u µ might transform to be spacelike from timelike along the trajectory. So it is important to clarify the relation between the divergent region and the superluminal region in spin-angular space.…”
It is well known that some black holes can act as accelerators for particles without spin. Recently, there are some works considering collision of two spinning particles in the background of Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes and it was shown that the center-of-mass energy of the test particles is related to the spin. In this paper we extend the results to some more general cases. We consider Kerr-Newman black holes as accelerators for spinning particles. We derive the center-ofmass energy of the spinning particles and use numerical method to investigate how the center-of-mass energy is affected by the properties of the black holes and spinning particles.
“…The CM energy for the extremal KN black hole near the horizon is (25) where the K 4 is defined in appendix A. We can see that when a 2 −j 1 a + 1 = 0 or a 2 −j 2 a + 1 = 0 the CM energy will be divergent and the critical total angular momentumj i = 1+a 2 a (i = 1, 2), which is the same as that of Ref.…”
Section: Extremal Kerr-newman Black Hole Casementioning
confidence: 74%
“…The case with a = Q = 0 describes the Schwarzschild black hole as an accelerator of spinning test particles given in Ref. [25].…”
Section: Spinning Particles In Charged Spinning Black Hole Backgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the velocity vector u µ and the canonical momentum vector P µ of the spinning test particle are not parallel [22,25,[28][29][30], and the canonical momentum P µ satisfies P µ P µ = −m 2 which indicates that the canonical momentum vector keeps timelike along the trajectory. However, the velocity vector u µ of the spinning test particle might transform to be spacelike from timelike [22,25,28].…”
Section: Velocity Of Spinning Test Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the velocity vector u µ of the spinning test particle might transform to be spacelike from timelike [22,25,28]. This can be avoided if one considers the reaction of the spinning test particles to the spacetime, and the results will be more accurate.…”
Section: Velocity Of Spinning Test Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Refs. [22,25,[28][29][30] show that the velocity vector u µ and the canonical momentum vector P µ of the spinning test particle are not parallel, and the velocity vector u µ might transform to be spacelike from timelike along the trajectory. So it is important to clarify the relation between the divergent region and the superluminal region in spin-angular space.…”
It is well known that some black holes can act as accelerators for particles without spin. Recently, there are some works considering collision of two spinning particles in the background of Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes and it was shown that the center-of-mass energy of the test particles is related to the spin. In this paper we extend the results to some more general cases. We consider Kerr-Newman black holes as accelerators for spinning particles. We derive the center-ofmass energy of the spinning particles and use numerical method to investigate how the center-of-mass energy is affected by the properties of the black holes and spinning particles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.